Impacts of fire on canopy structure and its resilience depend on successional stage in Amazonian secondary forests

Abstract Secondary forests in the Amazon are important carbon sinks, biodiversity reservoirs, and connections between forest fragments. However, their regrowth is highly threatened by fire. Using airborne laser scanning (ALS), surveyed between 2016 and 2018, we analyzed canopy metrics in burned (fires occurred between 2001 and 2018) and unburned secondary forests across different successional stages and their ability to recover after fire. We assessed maximum and mean canopy height, openness at 5 and 10 m, canopy roughness, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area height volume (LAHV) for 20 sites across South‐East Amazonia (ranging from 375 to 1200 ha). Compared to unburned forests, burned forests had reductions in canopy height, LAI, and LAHV, and increases in openness and roughness. These effects were more pronounced in early successional (ES) than later successional (LS) stages, for example, mean canopy height decreased 33% in ES and 14% in LS and LAI decreased 36% in ES and 18% in LS. Forests in ES stages were less resistant to fire, but more resilient (capable of recovering from a disturbance) in their post‐fire regrowth than LS stage forests. Data extrapolation from our models suggests that canopy structure partially recovers with time since fire for six out of seven canopy metrics; however, LAI and LAHV in LS forests may never fully recover. Our results indicate that successional stage‐specific management and policies that mitigate against fire in early secondary forests should be implemented to increase the success of forest regeneration. Mitigation of fires is critical if secondary forests are to continue to provide their wide array of ecological services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.431
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of fire on canopy structure and its resilience depend on successional stage in Amazonian secondary forests

Ricardo Dalagnol, Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida, Ted R. Feldpausch, Eric Bastos Görgens et al.
6 citations
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Fire effects on ecosystems
6.63
article

Impacts of fire on canopy structure and its resilience depend on successional stage in Amazonian secondary forests

Ricardo Dalagnol, Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida, Ted R. Feldpausch, Eric Bastos Görgens, Mauro Assis, Laura B. Vedovato, David C. Bartholomew, Jean Pierre Ometto, Rubén Valbuena, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Celso H. L. Silva, Aline Pontes Lopes, Carlos Alberto Silva
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Secondary forests in the Amazon are important carbon sinks, biodiversity reservoirs, and connections between forest fragments. However, their regrowth is highly threatened by fire. Using airborne laser scanning (ALS), surveyed between 2016 and 2018, we analyzed canopy metrics in burned (fires occurred between 2001 and 2018) and unburned secondary forests across different successional stages and their ability to recover after fire. We assessed maximum and mean canopy height, openness at 5 and 10 m, canopy roughness, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area height volume (LAHV) for 20 sites across South‐East Amazonia (ranging from 375 to 1200 ha). Compared to unburned forests, burned forests had reductions in canopy height, LAI, and LAHV, and increases in openness and roughness. These effects were more pronounced in early successional (ES) than later successional (LS) stages, for example, mean canopy height decreased 33% in ES and 14% in LS and LAI decreased 36% in ES and 18% in LS. Forests in ES stages were less resistant to fire, but more resilient (capable of recovering from a disturbance) in their post‐fire regrowth than LS stage forests. Data extrapolation from our models suggests that canopy structure partially recovers with time since fire for six out of seven canopy metrics; however, LAI and LAHV in LS forests may never fully recover. Our results indicate that successional stage‐specific management and policies that mitigate against fire in early secondary forests should be implemented to increase the success of forest regeneration. Mitigation of fires is critical if secondary forests are to continue to provide their wide array of ecological services.

Remote Sensing in Ecology and ConservationVol. 11(4)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Botanic Gardens Conservation International (GB), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Exeter (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), University of Florida (US), Amazon Research Foundation (BR), Forest Science and Research Institute (BR), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), Universidade Federal do Maranhão (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR), Umeå University (SE)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Sight Research UK, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, Fundo Amazônia, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fire effects on ecosystems
6.63
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.