Decolonizing Public Administration in Latin America: A Systematic Literature Review of Trending Discussions in the Region

ABSTRACT This study examines knowledge production and dissemination dynamics within Latin American Public Administration (PA) as reflected in SCIELO‐indexed journals. By applying a systematic review under PRISMA guidelines, it identifies thematic trends and institutional challenges shaping the regional epistemic community. The findings highlight systemic gaps, including limited journal specialization and underrepresentation of regional voices within the global PA discourse. The study emphasizes theoretical and methodological contributions addressing civil service reforms, PA education, and institutional development while critiquing the pervasive influence of epistemic colonialism. By proposing strategies to integrate local and global perspectives, this work advances the decolonization of PA, fostering inclusive and contextually relevant paradigms. These insights aim to enhance Latin American contributions to global PA debates, bridging disciplinary divides and addressing regional priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration and Development
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2092
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonizing Public Administration in Latin America: A Systematic Literature Review of Trending Discussions in the Region

Nicolás Didier
3 citations
Public Administration and Development
Public Policy and Administration Research
10.97
article

Decolonizing Public Administration in Latin America: A Systematic Literature Review of Trending Discussions in the Region

Nicolás Didier
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines knowledge production and dissemination dynamics within Latin American Public Administration (PA) as reflected in SCIELO‐indexed journals. By applying a systematic review under PRISMA guidelines, it identifies thematic trends and institutional challenges shaping the regional epistemic community. The findings highlight systemic gaps, including limited journal specialization and underrepresentation of regional voices within the global PA discourse. The study emphasizes theoretical and methodological contributions addressing civil service reforms, PA education, and institutional development while critiquing the pervasive influence of epistemic colonialism. By proposing strategies to integrate local and global perspectives, this work advances the decolonization of PA, fostering inclusive and contextually relevant paradigms. These insights aim to enhance Latin American contributions to global PA debates, bridging disciplinary divides and addressing regional priorities.

Public Administration and Development
Gobierno de Chile (CL), University of Chile (CL)
Universidad de Chile
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Public Policy and Administration Research
10.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.