Predictors of futile recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients transferred for endovascular treatment

Some patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) achieve insufficient clinical improvement (futile recanalization, FR) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy, while others show good outcomes (effective recanalization, ER). This study assessed FR and ER rates among patients treated with IVT at non-thrombectomy primary stroke centers (PSCs) and aimed to identify predictors of FR. We analyzed data from two PSC registries (2016-2022). Inclusion criteria: IVT treatment, anterior circulation LVO, NIHSS ≥ 6, ASPECTS ≥ 5, and documented recanalization at thrombectomy centers. FR was defined as a 90-day poor outcome (mRS 3-6) despite LVO recanalization on initial angiography. Among 190 PSC patients with documented recanalization post-IVT, 113 (59.5%) had FR. Multivariable analysis identified age (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.07, p = 0.021), NIHSS at the PSC (OR = 1.13, 95%CI = 1.05-1.22, p = 0.026), and collateral status (OR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.39-0.75, p = 0.001) as independent predictors of FR and 90-day mortality. A model combining age, NIHSS, and collateral score provided the highest predictive accuracy for FR and mortality. FR is common in LVO-related ischemic stroke treated with IVT at non-thrombectomy centers. FR is common in LVO-related ischemic stroke treated with IVT at non-thrombectomy centers. Identifying predictors of FR can guide clinicians in early decision-making, allowing for tailored interventions and informed discussions about expected outcomes, potentially leading to more optimized patient management.The GOTIC-VTE trial Unique identifier, jRCTs031180124; Registration date, April 06, 2017.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03070-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of futile recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients transferred for endovascular treatment

Lucio D’Anna, Sara Pez, Lisa Knight, Alessandro Marè et al.
2 citations
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
2.71
article

Predictors of futile recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients transferred for endovascular treatment

Lucio D’Anna, Sara Pez, Lisa Knight, Alessandro Marè, Francesco Bax, Massimo Sponza, Mariarosaria Valente, Fedra Kuris, Giovanni Merlino, Soma Banerjee, Simona Sacco, Thanh N. Nguyen, Matteo Foschi, Viva Levee, Arianna Cella, Luke Dixon, Kyriakos Lobotesis, Gian Luigi Gigli, Feras Fayez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Some patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) achieve insufficient clinical improvement (futile recanalization, FR) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy, while others show good outcomes (effective recanalization, ER). This study assessed FR and ER rates among patients treated with IVT at non-thrombectomy primary stroke centers (PSCs) and aimed to identify predictors of FR. We analyzed data from two PSC registries (2016-2022). Inclusion criteria: IVT treatment, anterior circulation LVO, NIHSS ≥ 6, ASPECTS ≥ 5, and documented recanalization at thrombectomy centers. FR was defined as a 90-day poor outcome (mRS 3-6) despite LVO recanalization on initial angiography. Among 190 PSC patients with documented recanalization post-IVT, 113 (59.5%) had FR. Multivariable analysis identified age (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.07, p = 0.021), NIHSS at the PSC (OR = 1.13, 95%CI = 1.05-1.22, p = 0.026), and collateral status (OR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.39-0.75, p = 0.001) as independent predictors of FR and 90-day mortality. A model combining age, NIHSS, and collateral score provided the highest predictive accuracy for FR and mortality. FR is common in LVO-related ischemic stroke treated with IVT at non-thrombectomy centers. FR is common in LVO-related ischemic stroke treated with IVT at non-thrombectomy centers. Identifying predictors of FR can guide clinicians in early decision-making, allowing for tailored interventions and informed discussions about expected outcomes, potentially leading to more optimized patient management.The GOTIC-VTE trial Unique identifier, jRCTs031180124; Registration date, April 06, 2017.

Journal of Thrombosis and ThrombolysisVol. 58(2)
Boston Medical Center (US), University of Udine (IT), Harvard University (US), University of L'Aquila (IT), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.