Energy Analysis of Electrofiltration in a Homogeneous Macroporous α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Membrane

Membrane filtration offers high-quality permeate at the cost of energy-intensive mechanical pumping. Electrofiltration, or electric field-assisted water permeation, has shown promise in reducing energy expenses, eliminating mechanical components, and providing instantaneous flow reversal for membrane defouling. However, fundamental analysis of the energy consumption, energy efficiency, defined as the specific energy consumption, SEC, and standardized nomenclature hinders development. Using a sintered random loose packing of monodisperse α-Al2O3 spheres to create a well-defined geometry, microstructure, and composition, we investigated electroosmotic flow through the membrane to evaluate the SEC of components within an electrofiltration membrane. At minimal transmembrane pressure and compared to no electric field, application of an electrical potential, ΔΦ, of 10 V (pressure difference of 1.2 kPa, pH 3.8, and 22 °C) increased the membrane flux 15-fold from the initial 2–31 LMH. The observed energy consumption with the well-defined physical membrane properties and net electroosmotic flow (EOF) of 29 LMH resulted in SECEOF = 0.31 kWh/m3. A fundamental determination of the theoretical minimum SEC, SECEOFmin, is estimated to be 0.006 kWh/m3. While the SECEOF determined is efficient for traditional membrane filtration and literature reported SECEOF, the SECEOF in this study is ascribed almost entirely to electrode losses and ionic transport resistance. These energy losses indicate significant opportunities to improve energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtrations. This quantitative evaluation identifies electrofiltration performance and reasons for energy loss within an EOF system, which may be further studied to improve the energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Engineering
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00768
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Analysis of Electrofiltration in a Homogeneous Macroporous α-Al2O3 Membrane

Wm. Vincent Anderson, H. Verweij, Linda K. Weavers
2 citations
ACS ES&T Engineering
Membrane Separation Technologies
1.63
article

Energy Analysis of Electrofiltration in a Homogeneous Macroporous α-Al2O3 Membrane

Wm. Vincent Anderson, H. Verweij, Linda K. Weavers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Membrane filtration offers high-quality permeate at the cost of energy-intensive mechanical pumping. Electrofiltration, or electric field-assisted water permeation, has shown promise in reducing energy expenses, eliminating mechanical components, and providing instantaneous flow reversal for membrane defouling. However, fundamental analysis of the energy consumption, energy efficiency, defined as the specific energy consumption, SEC, and standardized nomenclature hinders development. Using a sintered random loose packing of monodisperse α-Al2O3 spheres to create a well-defined geometry, microstructure, and composition, we investigated electroosmotic flow through the membrane to evaluate the SEC of components within an electrofiltration membrane. At minimal transmembrane pressure and compared to no electric field, application of an electrical potential, ΔΦ, of 10 V (pressure difference of 1.2 kPa, pH 3.8, and 22 °C) increased the membrane flux 15-fold from the initial 2–31 LMH. The observed energy consumption with the well-defined physical membrane properties and net electroosmotic flow (EOF) of 29 LMH resulted in SECEOF = 0.31 kWh/m3. A fundamental determination of the theoretical minimum SEC, SECEOFmin, is estimated to be 0.006 kWh/m3. While the SECEOF determined is efficient for traditional membrane filtration and literature reported SECEOF, the SECEOF in this study is ascribed almost entirely to electrode losses and ionic transport resistance. These energy losses indicate significant opportunities to improve energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtrations. This quantitative evaluation identifies electrofiltration performance and reasons for energy loss within an EOF system, which may be further studied to improve the energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtration.

ACS ES&T EngineeringVol. 5(4)
Geodetic Institute of Slovenia (SI), The Ohio State University (US)
Ohio State University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Membrane Separation Technologies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.