Potential use of DNA methylation in cervical swabs for early ovarian cancer diagnosis

None of the statistical methods applied identified CpG loci capable of diagnosing ovarian cancer with sufficient specificity and sensitivity. We conclude that methylation differences observed do not adequately distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian disease. The variations attributable to clinical conditions are likely obscured by the differences in cell composition, which is the primary source of sample heterogeneity. Therefore, we suggest that diagnostic tools should not rely on local methylation profile of the cervix but rather focus on detecting cancer-specific sequences transferred from the tumor site and present in cervical swabs. Ovarian cancer is difficult to detect early, and we aimed to explore whether DNA methylation in cervical swabs could serve as a diagnostic tool. However, our study found that methylation patterns in these samples do not reliably distinguish between benign and malignant conditions, likely due to variations in cell composition. We recommend future research focus on detecting tumor-specific DNA sequences in cervical swabs instead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ovarian Research
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01609-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential use of DNA methylation in cervical swabs for early ovarian cancer diagnosis

Claus Høgdall, Estrid Høgdall, Edyta Biskup, Joanna Lopacinska‐Jørgensen
2 citations
Journal of Ovarian Research
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
1.61
article

Potential use of DNA methylation in cervical swabs for early ovarian cancer diagnosis

Claus Høgdall, Estrid Høgdall, Edyta Biskup, Joanna Lopacinska‐Jørgensen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

None of the statistical methods applied identified CpG loci capable of diagnosing ovarian cancer with sufficient specificity and sensitivity. We conclude that methylation differences observed do not adequately distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian disease. The variations attributable to clinical conditions are likely obscured by the differences in cell composition, which is the primary source of sample heterogeneity. Therefore, we suggest that diagnostic tools should not rely on local methylation profile of the cervix but rather focus on detecting cancer-specific sequences transferred from the tumor site and present in cervical swabs. Ovarian cancer is difficult to detect early, and we aimed to explore whether DNA methylation in cervical swabs could serve as a diagnostic tool. However, our study found that methylation patterns in these samples do not reliably distinguish between benign and malignant conditions, likely due to variations in cell composition. We recommend future research focus on detecting tumor-specific DNA sequences in cervical swabs instead.

Journal of Ovarian ResearchVol. 18(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Herlev Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Københavns Universitet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Potential use of DNA methylation in cervical swabs for early ovarian cancer diagnosis — Claus Høgdall, Estrid Høgdall, et al. · Journal of Ovarian Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS