Exploring Researchers’ Perspectives on Institutional Review Boards Functions in Saudi Arabia: A Survey Utilizing the IRB-RAT Tool
According's to researchers point of view; IRBs respect researchers, view human protections as a primary role, do not allow personal bias, maintain accurate records and take timely action whenever misconduct is reported. Further collaborations are needed to enhance IRB performance and to engage researchers in more productive communication with their IRBs.
Authors
- Abeer Omar
- Yasmin Altwaijri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8826-3224)
- Amani Almeharish (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-0857)
- Asim Khogeer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-7747)
- Areej Alfattani
- Norah Albedah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-4668)
- Asma Alshahrani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-1843)
- Ammar Alkawi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-2962)
- M. Zuheir Al-Kawi
Institutions
- King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (SA)
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
- Maternity and Children's Hospital (SA)
- Ministry of Health (SA)
- Hera General Hospital (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2025-02-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01179-4
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88