Balancing ecotourism and wildlife management through a conservation behavior approach

Abstract Ecotourism promises to reconcile wildlife conservation and human development if negative impacts of human visitation and associated infrastructure can be minimized. Animal behavior studies can be used to identify individual and population responses to anthropogenic impacts before other fitness consequences are documented. With input from professionals in animal behavior and ecotourism, we identified key questions needed to better understand the impact of ecotourism on wildlife. Activity budgets, foraging, movement, stress, habituation, and reproduction were themes that emerged from our survey. We highlight promising research on these themes and identify remaining behavioral research questions about conserving wildlife in the context of ecotourism. Although ecotourism activities often have detrimental effects on animal behavior, we highlight research needs that can inform management and ecotourist education to improve human behavior to be more compatible with sustainable use of nature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13306
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing ecotourism and wildlife management through a conservation behavior approach

Josue David Arteaga‐Torres, Debra A. Hamilton, Rachel Y. Chock, Jennifer L. Verdolin et al.
5 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
article

Balancing ecotourism and wildlife management through a conservation behavior approach

Josue David Arteaga‐Torres, Debra A. Hamilton, Rachel Y. Chock, Jennifer L. Verdolin, Gabriela Medeiros de Pinho, Claudio M. Monteza‐Moreno, Javier Rodríguez‐Fonseca, Luis Sandoval, Barbara Clucas, A. Allison, Liv Baker, Brett Seymoure, Bernard M. Kitheka, Bruce A. Schulte, Jimmy W. Wehsener, J. Edgardo Arévalo, Daniel T. Blumstein, Jessica Stamn, Cassandra M.V. Nuñez, Lynn Von Hagen, Richard Buchholz, Eduardo Bessa, Laney H. Nute
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Ecotourism promises to reconcile wildlife conservation and human development if negative impacts of human visitation and associated infrastructure can be minimized. Animal behavior studies can be used to identify individual and population responses to anthropogenic impacts before other fitness consequences are documented. With input from professionals in animal behavior and ecotourism, we identified key questions needed to better understand the impact of ecotourism on wildlife. Activity budgets, foraging, movement, stress, habituation, and reproduction were themes that emerged from our survey. We highlight promising research on these themes and identify remaining behavioral research questions about conserving wildlife in the context of ecotourism. Although ecotourism activities often have detrimental effects on animal behavior, we highlight research needs that can inform management and ecotourist education to improve human behavior to be more compatible with sustainable use of nature.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(3)
New Mexico State University (US), University of Vermont (US), Missouri State University (US), Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza Catie (CR), University of Vienna (AT), North Carolina State University (US), University of Arizona (US), California Polytechnic State University (US), Universidade de Brasília (BR), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (AT), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Cal Poly Humboldt (US), Universidad de Costa Rica (CR), University of Mississippi (US), Hunter College (US), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research (US), Auburn University (US), University of Memphis (US), California State Polytechnic University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
Animal Behavior Society, Office of Global Engagement, Drexel University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.