A study of inclusive supervisory behaviors, workplace social inclusion and turnover intention in the context of employee age
Purpose The Australian retail industry is facing skills shortages while mature and old-age workers are experiencing high unemployment rates. This study focuses on understanding organizational inclusion and turnover intentions in the context of employee age. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected from 502 retail supervisors and employees. Findings Drawing on socioemotional selectivity theory and social exchange theory, the findings indicate: no difference in inclusive supervisory behaviors perceptions for different age groups; a significantly higher workplace social inclusion perceptions among employees aged 55 plus than among employees aged 35–44; a significantly lower turnover intention among employees aged 55 plus and 45–54 years than other age groups; a positive relationship between inclusive supervisory behaviors and workplace social inclusion and a negative relationship between workplace social inclusion and turnover intention which was stronger for older employees than for younger employees. Practical implications The findings present a business case for hiring older employees and indicate that managers need to prioritize inclusion. Originality/value This study addresses the underexplored area of employee age differences in inclusion and turnover perceptions among retail employees. It links inclusive supervisory behaviors, social inclusion and turnover intention.
Authors
- Muhammad Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-8033)
- Ranjita Islam
- Mirit K. Grabarski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-9410)
- Marzena Baker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-5325)
Institutions
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Lakehead University (CA)
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Employee Relations
- Published
- 2025-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/er-04-2024-0252
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.29