Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Sustainable Education: a Case Study of Indonesian Junior High School Students in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Support SDG-4 Quality Education

Objective: This study examines the critical thinking skills (CTS) of Indonesian junior high school students in science learning, with a focus on food additives, to contribute to SDG 4: Quality Education. The aim is to identify areas for improving critical thinking to foster 21st-century competencies necessary for sustainable education and real-world problem-solving. Theoretical Framework: The research is based on Ennis' critical thinking framework, which identifies five key indicators: providing simple explanations, building basic skills, concluding, making further explanations, and setting strategies and tactics. These indicators form the foundation for evaluating CTS in the context of science education. Method: This descriptive quantitative study involved 46 eighth-grade students from the Indonesian School of Kuala Lumpur (SIKL). Data were collected using a CTS questionnaire aligned with Ennis’ indicators, and responses were analyzed to assess students' critical thinking levels. Results and Discussion: The findings showed an average CTS score of 52.66, indicating a moderate level of critical thinking. Among the participants, 4.3% were highly critical, 26.1% were critical, 47.8% were moderately critical, 19.6% were less critical, and 2.2% showed little to no critical thinking. Students performed best in providing simple explanations (66.39) and weakest in making further explanations (48.89). The discussion emphasizes the importance of integrating innovative learning models, such as Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and STEM, to enhance students' CTS and align with SDG 4, fostering critical thinking as a fundamental aspect of quality education. Research Implications: This study highlights the significance of developing educational strategies to improve CTS, especially in science education, to prepare students for complex challenges and contribute to achieving SDG 4, ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education for all. Originality/Value: This research offers valuable insights into the CTS profiles of middle school students and underscores the importance of innovative teaching methods in nurturing critical thinking skills, thereby advancing the objectives of SDG 4 and promoting sustainable education practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n03.pe04842
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Sustainable Education: a Case Study of Indonesian Junior High School Students in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Support SDG-4 Quality Education

Achmad Lutfi, Suyatno Sutoyo, Julia Astutik
1 citations
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Sustainable Education: a Case Study of Indonesian Junior High School Students in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Support SDG-4 Quality Education

Achmad Lutfi, Suyatno Sutoyo, Julia Astutik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the critical thinking skills (CTS) of Indonesian junior high school students in science learning, with a focus on food additives, to contribute to SDG 4: Quality Education. The aim is to identify areas for improving critical thinking to foster 21st-century competencies necessary for sustainable education and real-world problem-solving. Theoretical Framework: The research is based on Ennis' critical thinking framework, which identifies five key indicators: providing simple explanations, building basic skills, concluding, making further explanations, and setting strategies and tactics. These indicators form the foundation for evaluating CTS in the context of science education. Method: This descriptive quantitative study involved 46 eighth-grade students from the Indonesian School of Kuala Lumpur (SIKL). Data were collected using a CTS questionnaire aligned with Ennis’ indicators, and responses were analyzed to assess students' critical thinking levels. Results and Discussion: The findings showed an average CTS score of 52.66, indicating a moderate level of critical thinking. Among the participants, 4.3% were highly critical, 26.1% were critical, 47.8% were moderately critical, 19.6% were less critical, and 2.2% showed little to no critical thinking. Students performed best in providing simple explanations (66.39) and weakest in making further explanations (48.89). The discussion emphasizes the importance of integrating innovative learning models, such as Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and STEM, to enhance students' CTS and align with SDG 4, fostering critical thinking as a fundamental aspect of quality education. Research Implications: This study highlights the significance of developing educational strategies to improve CTS, especially in science education, to prepare students for complex challenges and contribute to achieving SDG 4, ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education for all. Originality/Value: This research offers valuable insights into the CTS profiles of middle school students and underscores the importance of innovative teaching methods in nurturing critical thinking skills, thereby advancing the objectives of SDG 4 and promoting sustainable education practices.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs ReviewVol. 5(3)
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.