EFFECTS OF CYCLIST RIDING POSTURE ON HEAD KINEMATICS RESPONSE AND INJURY IN VEHICLE–BICYCLE COLLISION

This study aims to investigate the effects of a cyclist’s riding posture on the kinematic response and head injury severity involved in car–bicycle collision. For this purpose, the finite element (FE) model of a common shared bicycle was developed based on its geometric parameters and a 50% THUMS human FE model was employed to conduct this study. Furthermore, a total of 4 simulation tests were carried out via using four riding postures (pedal [Formula: see text], pedal [Formula: see text], pedal [Formula: see text], pedal [Formula: see text]) with an impact speed of 40[Formula: see text]km/h and riding speed of 10[Formula: see text]km/h. Finally, the head kinematic responses and injury severity were analyzed by employing the output head kinematic and injury parameters. The results revealed that head kinematic responses and kinematic injury criteria varied with the different riding postures. The head responses were similar between the pedal [Formula: see text] and pedal [Formula: see text] postures, as well as between the pedal [Formula: see text] and pedal [Formula: see text] postures. The head injury risk was lowest in the pedal [Formula: see text] posture. It was notable that the brain tissue injury criterion in the pedal [Formula: see text] posture showed significant differences with other riding postures. It was exhibited that a maximum principal strain was 41% to 84% higher and the magnitude of shear stress was 22% to 27% of that in other riding postures. The results of this study may provide insights to enhance safety measures for cyclists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519425500034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF CYCLIST RIDING POSTURE ON HEAD KINEMATICS RESPONSE AND INJURY IN VEHICLE–BICYCLE COLLISION

Jun Zou, You Gong, Yong Han, Xiang Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
1.52
article

EFFECTS OF CYCLIST RIDING POSTURE ON HEAD KINEMATICS RESPONSE AND INJURY IN VEHICLE–BICYCLE COLLISION

Jun Zou, You Gong, Yong Han, Xiang Zhang, Bingyu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of a cyclist’s riding posture on the kinematic response and head injury severity involved in car–bicycle collision. For this purpose, the finite element (FE) model of a common shared bicycle was developed based on its geometric parameters and a 50% THUMS human FE model was employed to conduct this study. Furthermore, a total of 4 simulation tests were carried out via using four riding postures (pedal [Formula: see text], pedal [Formula: see text], pedal [Formula: see text], pedal [Formula: see text]) with an impact speed of 40[Formula: see text]km/h and riding speed of 10[Formula: see text]km/h. Finally, the head kinematic responses and injury severity were analyzed by employing the output head kinematic and injury parameters. The results revealed that head kinematic responses and kinematic injury criteria varied with the different riding postures. The head responses were similar between the pedal [Formula: see text] and pedal [Formula: see text] postures, as well as between the pedal [Formula: see text] and pedal [Formula: see text] postures. The head injury risk was lowest in the pedal [Formula: see text] posture. It was notable that the brain tissue injury criterion in the pedal [Formula: see text] posture showed significant differences with other riding postures. It was exhibited that a maximum principal strain was 41% to 84% higher and the magnitude of shear stress was 22% to 27% of that in other riding postures. The results of this study may provide insights to enhance safety measures for cyclists.

Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 25(04)
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau (CN), Shenyang Environmental Protection Bureau (CN), Xiamen University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.