Fast and Deterministic Method for Compressed Sensing Based Pilot Patterns Allocation

Irregular pilot patterns with low mutual coherence allow to reduce pilot overhead with the help of Compressed Sensing algorithms. Algorithms for pilot positions generation usually have high computational complexity or depend on random initialization result. They can be used to precalculate pilot positions for all possible combinations of configuration parameters, but for practical systems the amount of data to be stored is large. In this article we propose fast and deterministic method for finding pilot patterns. We compared it with other algorithms from literature. Proposed method wins strongly (O(NK) vs O(N<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>K)) in computational complexity and (near 100 times faster) time of execution with minimal losing (less than 1%) in achieved capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icct62929.2024.10875027
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast and Deterministic Method for Compressed Sensing Based Pilot Patterns Allocation

Mikhail Fedorov
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
article

Fast and Deterministic Method for Compressed Sensing Based Pilot Patterns Allocation

Mikhail Fedorov
article en

Abstract

Irregular pilot patterns with low mutual coherence allow to reduce pilot overhead with the help of Compressed Sensing algorithms. Algorithms for pilot positions generation usually have high computational complexity or depend on random initialization result. They can be used to precalculate pilot positions for all possible combinations of configuration parameters, but for practical systems the amount of data to be stored is large. In this article we propose fast and deterministic method for finding pilot patterns. We compared it with other algorithms from literature. Proposed method wins strongly (O(NK) vs O(N<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>K)) in computational complexity and (near 100 times faster) time of execution with minimal losing (less than 1%) in achieved capacity.

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.