Navigating Legal Frameworks for National Resilience: A Comparative Analysis of Key Disaster Management Laws in Thailand and Japan

This study compares the disaster management laws of Thailand and Japan. The research reveals significant differences in legislative approaches, reflecting each country's unique historical, and governance contexts. Japan's law demonstrates a more comprehensive approach to the disaster management cycle and stakeholder involvement, with integrated financial provisions. Thailand's law emphasizes organizational aspects. Both prioritize response measures but show potential gaps in addressing preparedness and mitigation phases. The study identifies areas for further investigation, including financial measures, and international cooperation approaches. This comparative analysis offers valuable insights into both countries' ongoing development of disaster management systems and highlights potential areas for mutual learning and improvement in disaster risk reduction strategies. Creating resilience in the society through the core of the government working and stakeholders' given authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ica-symp63674.2025.10876468
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Legal Frameworks for National Resilience: A Comparative Analysis of Key Disaster Management Laws in Thailand and Japan

Kodchakorn Krutphong, Ratchaneekorn Thongthip, Ampan Laosunthara
1 citations
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.13
article

Navigating Legal Frameworks for National Resilience: A Comparative Analysis of Key Disaster Management Laws in Thailand and Japan

Kodchakorn Krutphong, Ratchaneekorn Thongthip, Ampan Laosunthara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compares the disaster management laws of Thailand and Japan. The research reveals significant differences in legislative approaches, reflecting each country's unique historical, and governance contexts. Japan's law demonstrates a more comprehensive approach to the disaster management cycle and stakeholder involvement, with integrated financial provisions. Thailand's law emphasizes organizational aspects. Both prioritize response measures but show potential gaps in addressing preparedness and mitigation phases. The study identifies areas for further investigation, including financial measures, and international cooperation approaches. This comparative analysis offers valuable insights into both countries' ongoing development of disaster management systems and highlights potential areas for mutual learning and improvement in disaster risk reduction strategies. Creating resilience in the society through the core of the government working and stakeholders' given authorities.

Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University (TH), Mahidol University (TH), Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.