The standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in emergency medicine: The internal validity of the SLOE 2.0
The study demonstrates left skew in eSLOE 2.0 scoring, including a higher prevalence of scores in the fully and mostly entrustable ranges for part A and the consistently high scores in part B.
Authors
- Alexandra Mannix (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-3339)
- Teresa Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1944-5603)
- Sandra Monteiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8723-5942)
- Sara Krzyzaniak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-2750)
- Michael A. Gottlieb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375)
- Katarzyna Gore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-3327)
- Al’ai Alvarez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-2476)
- Cullen Hegarty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-8675)
- Sharon Bord (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5987-4139)
- Melissa Parsons (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-5224)
- Thomas Beardsley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6329-3336)
- Aman Pandey
Institutions
- Regions Hospital (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- HealthPartners (US)
- Florida College (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- AEM Education and Training
- Published
- 2025-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70000
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88