DETERMINANTS IN THE STANDARDS REVIEW PROCESS: AN ANALYSIS OF IFRS FOR SMES

The IFRS for SMEs is a simplified framework of financial reporting standards designed specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The IASB issued this standard to cater to entities that do not have public accountability but still need to prepare high-quality financial statements for internal and external stakeholders. This study focuses on comprehending and appreciating the crucial influence of stakeholders in developing accounting standards. Their involvement is not merely a factor but an essential element of the standard-setting process. We will conduct a qualitative analysis of comments letters from the First Comprehensive Review of IFRS for SMEs, acknowledging the importance of each contribution. The analysis will also delve into the relationships between the IASB and the stakeholders, aiming to uncover insights into stakeholder influences and IASB independence during the review process. The IASB has been criticized for not considering the perspectives of users and owners in establishing requirements, particularly in the IFRS for SMEs. The analysis reveals a high similarity between Europe and other Global organisations, mainly due to their European origins. However, responses from Oceania show the lowest similarity, mainly due to limited comment letters. Professional organizations, Accounting Regulatory Bodies, and Accounting, audit, and consultant firms share common concerns, while Insurance Agencies show lower similarity due to differing concerns and vocabulary. The IASB should consider the interests of all stakeholders, but the lack of clarity on revision criteria may undermine its legitimacy and transparency. Therefore, it is crucial to provide clear and transparent revision criteria to ensure universally accepted standards and enhance stakeholder confidence in the process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Economica
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56043/reveco-2024-0033
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DETERMINANTS IN THE STANDARDS REVIEW PROCESS: AN ANALYSIS OF IFRS FOR SMES

Alexandra-Gabriela MARINA, Ioana Andreea Bogoslov, Daria Maria SITEA
Revista Economica
Research, Science, and Academia
article

DETERMINANTS IN THE STANDARDS REVIEW PROCESS: AN ANALYSIS OF IFRS FOR SMES

Alexandra-Gabriela MARINA, Ioana Andreea Bogoslov, Daria Maria SITEA
article en

Abstract

The IFRS for SMEs is a simplified framework of financial reporting standards designed specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The IASB issued this standard to cater to entities that do not have public accountability but still need to prepare high-quality financial statements for internal and external stakeholders. This study focuses on comprehending and appreciating the crucial influence of stakeholders in developing accounting standards. Their involvement is not merely a factor but an essential element of the standard-setting process. We will conduct a qualitative analysis of comments letters from the First Comprehensive Review of IFRS for SMEs, acknowledging the importance of each contribution. The analysis will also delve into the relationships between the IASB and the stakeholders, aiming to uncover insights into stakeholder influences and IASB independence during the review process. The IASB has been criticized for not considering the perspectives of users and owners in establishing requirements, particularly in the IFRS for SMEs. The analysis reveals a high similarity between Europe and other Global organisations, mainly due to their European origins. However, responses from Oceania show the lowest similarity, mainly due to limited comment letters. Professional organizations, Accounting Regulatory Bodies, and Accounting, audit, and consultant firms share common concerns, while Insurance Agencies show lower similarity due to differing concerns and vocabulary. The IASB should consider the interests of all stakeholders, but the lack of clarity on revision criteria may undermine its legitimacy and transparency. Therefore, it is crucial to provide clear and transparent revision criteria to ensure universally accepted standards and enhance stakeholder confidence in the process.

Revista EconomicaVol. 76(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Research, Science, and Academia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DETERMINANTS IN THE STANDARDS REVIEW PROCESS: AN ANALYSIS OF IFRS FOR SMES — Alexandra-Gabriela MARINA, Ioana Andreea Bogoslov, et al. · Revista Economica (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS