Genetic and Anatomical Determinants of Olfaction in Dogs and Wild Canids

Understanding the anatomical and genetic basis of complex phenotypic traits has long been a challenge for biological research. Domestic dogs offer a compelling model as they demonstrate more phenotypic variation than any other vertebrate species. Dogs have been intensely selected for specific traits and abilities, directly or indirectly, over the past 15,000 years since their initial domestication from the gray wolf. Because olfaction plays a central role in critical tasks, such as the detection of drugs, diseases, and explosives, as well as human rescue, we compared relative olfactory capacity across dog breeds and assessed changes to the canine olfactory system to their direct ancestors, wolves, and coyotes. We conducted a cross-disciplinary survey of olfactory anatomy, olfactory receptor (OR) gene variation, and OR gene expression in domestic dogs. Through comparisons to their closest wild canid relatives, the gray wolf and coyote, we show that domestic dogs might have lost functional OR genes commensurate with a documented reduction in nasal morphology as an outcome of the domestication process prior to breed formation. Critically, within domestic dogs alone, we found no genetic or morphological profile shared among functional or genealogical breed groupings, such as scent hounds, that might indicate evidence of any human-directed selection for enhanced olfaction. Instead, our results suggest that superior scent detection dogs likely owe their success to advantageous behavioral traits and training rather than an "olfactory edge" provided by morphology or genes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf035
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic and Anatomical Determinants of Olfaction in Dogs and Wild Canids

William J. Murphy, Alice Mouton, Matteo Pellegrini, Blaire Van Valkenburgh et al.
6 citations
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
8.79
article

Genetic and Anatomical Determinants of Olfaction in Dogs and Wild Canids

William J. Murphy, Alice Mouton, Matteo Pellegrini, Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Marco Morselli, Brent A. Craven, Deborah Bird, Robert K. Wayne, Gang Li, Jonathan M. Levine
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Understanding the anatomical and genetic basis of complex phenotypic traits has long been a challenge for biological research. Domestic dogs offer a compelling model as they demonstrate more phenotypic variation than any other vertebrate species. Dogs have been intensely selected for specific traits and abilities, directly or indirectly, over the past 15,000 years since their initial domestication from the gray wolf. Because olfaction plays a central role in critical tasks, such as the detection of drugs, diseases, and explosives, as well as human rescue, we compared relative olfactory capacity across dog breeds and assessed changes to the canine olfactory system to their direct ancestors, wolves, and coyotes. We conducted a cross-disciplinary survey of olfactory anatomy, olfactory receptor (OR) gene variation, and OR gene expression in domestic dogs. Through comparisons to their closest wild canid relatives, the gray wolf and coyote, we show that domestic dogs might have lost functional OR genes commensurate with a documented reduction in nasal morphology as an outcome of the domestication process prior to breed formation. Critically, within domestic dogs alone, we found no genetic or morphological profile shared among functional or genealogical breed groupings, such as scent hounds, that might indicate evidence of any human-directed selection for enhanced olfaction. Instead, our results suggest that superior scent detection dogs likely owe their success to advantageous behavioral traits and training rather than an "olfactory edge" provided by morphology or genes.

Molecular Biology and EvolutionVol. 42(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Liège (BE), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Texas College (US), Shaanxi Normal University (CN), Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation, Yale University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
8.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.