The Hebrew Community Council in Jerusalem and Shehitah Affairs—Between Political Split and Economic Intersection

ABSTRACT: This article explores the performance of shehitah (ritual slaughter according to rabbinic law) in British Mandate Jerusalem under the guidelines of the HCC (Hebrew Community Council)—an arm of the Jewish National Institutions—and the alliances that were forged around shehitah among various social and ideological sectors of the city. A prominent example is the collaboration of HCC at times with Agudath Israel, the main political-religious opposition party to the National Institutions, and at other times with Sephardi shehitah services, while creating shehitah regulations that negated the founding principles of the National Institutions. In the present article I argue that these alliances represent compromise over national principles that favored economic and civic interests; as such, civic compromise in Jerusalem engendered alliances in the communal sphere that would have been unrealizable in the national sphere.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Israel Studies
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2979/is.00031
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Hebrew Community Council in Jerusalem and Shehitah Affairs—Between Political Split and Economic Intersection

Tal Chenya
Israel Studies
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

The Hebrew Community Council in Jerusalem and Shehitah Affairs—Between Political Split and Economic Intersection

Tal Chenya
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article explores the performance of shehitah (ritual slaughter according to rabbinic law) in British Mandate Jerusalem under the guidelines of the HCC (Hebrew Community Council)—an arm of the Jewish National Institutions—and the alliances that were forged around shehitah among various social and ideological sectors of the city. A prominent example is the collaboration of HCC at times with Agudath Israel, the main political-religious opposition party to the National Institutions, and at other times with Sephardi shehitah services, while creating shehitah regulations that negated the founding principles of the National Institutions. In the present article I argue that these alliances represent compromise over national principles that favored economic and civic interests; as such, civic compromise in Jerusalem engendered alliances in the communal sphere that would have been unrealizable in the national sphere.

Israel StudiesVol. 29(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.