Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Characterization of Total and Astrocyte‐Enriched Extracellular Vesicles From Human Serum and Plasma

Extracellular vesicles (EV) which play critical roles in intercellular communication, have garnered interest as biomarkers with researchers studying brain-related disease processes due to their ability to be isolated from various biofluids. Astrocytes, a type of glial cell, play a critical role in neuronal regulation and function. As such, EV enriched from astrocytes can be used to interrogate cargo and identify mechanisms by which astrocytes communicate with other cells of the central nervous system or shed light on pathophysiological conditions. This manuscript compared five EV isolation methods (differential ultracentrifugation [dUC], precipitation, precipitation + purification, silicon carbon resin and size exclusion chromatography [SEC]) using small volumes of human plasma and serum with a focus on immunocapture of astrocyte-enriched EV (AEEV), with the excitatory amino acid transporter 1, or GLAST. Methods were evaluated on yield, purity, recovery and downstream application to include immunoassays for tetraspanin, immune and astrocyte markers. Results revealed that whilst precipitation-based methods such as ExoQuick yielded higher EV concentrations, size exclusion (SmartSEC, qEV) provided greater purity, emphasizing a trade-off between yield and purity. This study provides a comprehensive resource for researchers in selecting EV isolation methods tailored to small biobanked clinical samples, with the goal of advancing biomarker discovery in Neuroscience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Extracellular Biology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jex2.70035
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Characterization of Total and Astrocyte‐Enriched Extracellular Vesicles From Human Serum and Plasma

T. Kent Teague, Leandra K. Figueroa‐Hall, Ahlam M. Alarbi, Bethany N. Hannafon et al.
5 citations
Journal of Extracellular Biology
Extracellular vesicles in disease
4.03
article

Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Characterization of Total and Astrocyte‐Enriched Extracellular Vesicles From Human Serum and Plasma

T. Kent Teague, Leandra K. Figueroa‐Hall, Ahlam M. Alarbi, Bethany N. Hannafon, Jennifer L. Stewart, Victoria B. Risbrough, Rajagopal Ramesh, Kaiping Burrows, Martin P. Paulus, Chibing Tan, Cole Hladik
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EV) which play critical roles in intercellular communication, have garnered interest as biomarkers with researchers studying brain-related disease processes due to their ability to be isolated from various biofluids. Astrocytes, a type of glial cell, play a critical role in neuronal regulation and function. As such, EV enriched from astrocytes can be used to interrogate cargo and identify mechanisms by which astrocytes communicate with other cells of the central nervous system or shed light on pathophysiological conditions. This manuscript compared five EV isolation methods (differential ultracentrifugation [dUC], precipitation, precipitation + purification, silicon carbon resin and size exclusion chromatography [SEC]) using small volumes of human plasma and serum with a focus on immunocapture of astrocyte-enriched EV (AEEV), with the excitatory amino acid transporter 1, or GLAST. Methods were evaluated on yield, purity, recovery and downstream application to include immunoassays for tetraspanin, immune and astrocyte markers. Results revealed that whilst precipitation-based methods such as ExoQuick yielded higher EV concentrations, size exclusion (SmartSEC, qEV) provided greater purity, emphasizing a trade-off between yield and purity. This study provides a comprehensive resource for researchers in selecting EV isolation methods tailored to small biobanked clinical samples, with the goal of advancing biomarker discovery in Neuroscience.

Journal of Extracellular BiologyVol. 4(2)
Tulsa Community College (US), University of California San Diego (US), Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US), OU Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US), University of Oklahoma (US), University of Tulsa (US)
University of Oklahoma, Laureate Institute for Brain Research, University of Tulsa, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.