Improving Student Engagement in Co-curricular Programmes: The Role of Monitoring and Incentive Structures

Management educators are becoming increasingly interested in preparing their students for managerial and leadership roles in the job market, and soft skills have been touted as useful in this transition.Nevertheless, soft skills in public universities are difficult to develop in large class sizes, making co-curricular skills development training a good alternative.This paper is an instructional innovation piece that reports on the results of experimenting with different combined incentive and monitoring structures to understand their role in improving student engagement in a design thinking course aimed at developing soft skills in the extra-curricular setting.In this study, we analyzed quantitative and qualitative data from administrative records and interviews using descriptive, t-test and thematic analysis techniques to understand the effect of the combined mechanisms on engagement.Our findings indicate a significant difference between the control and treatment groups with regard to all engagement variables except for efforts to work harder.However, the mechanisms are more important in promoting behavioural engagement than cognitive and affective engagement.We recommend that management educators tailor incentives to specific engagement variables that drive desired outcomes rather than tying them to programme-level outcomes.Additionally, we suggest a need to understand the communication culture of students to shape decisions regarding monitoring mechanisms.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education/Journal of advocacy, research and education
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2024.3.424
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Student Engagement in Co-curricular Programmes: The Role of Monitoring and Incentive Structures

Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education/Journal of advocacy, research and education
Education Systems and Policy
article

Improving Student Engagement in Co-curricular Programmes: The Role of Monitoring and Incentive Structures

article en

Abstract

Management educators are becoming increasingly interested in preparing their students for managerial and leadership roles in the job market, and soft skills have been touted as useful in this transition.Nevertheless, soft skills in public universities are difficult to develop in large class sizes, making co-curricular skills development training a good alternative.This paper is an instructional innovation piece that reports on the results of experimenting with different combined incentive and monitoring structures to understand their role in improving student engagement in a design thinking course aimed at developing soft skills in the extra-curricular setting.In this study, we analyzed quantitative and qualitative data from administrative records and interviews using descriptive, t-test and thematic analysis techniques to understand the effect of the combined mechanisms on engagement.Our findings indicate a significant difference between the control and treatment groups with regard to all engagement variables except for efforts to work harder.However, the mechanisms are more important in promoting behavioural engagement than cognitive and affective engagement.We recommend that management educators tailor incentives to specific engagement variables that drive desired outcomes rather than tying them to programme-level outcomes.Additionally, we suggest a need to understand the communication culture of students to shape decisions regarding monitoring mechanisms.

Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education/Journal of advocacy, research and educationVol. 11(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.