The international turn in the study of the origins of late-19th-century imperialism: achievements, limits and new directions in the theory of uneven and combined development

The late 19th century witnessed an unparalleled spasm of imperial expansion that redrew the world map into a handful of colonial empires. The first attempt to explain what caused this epoch was the Hobson-Lenin classical theory of imperialism. Nonetheless, over the past century, interwoven between other criticisms, many have problematised the theory’s ‘internalism’ – its negligence of the undeniable impact of interactive multi-societal co-existence (or, simply, the international) towards this outburst – and correspondingly rectified it. These critiques have constituted an international turn on the topic, which indeed seeks to incorporate the causal significance of the international. Yet, this turn faces two key limitations: an over-reliance on thick and supposedly atheoretical historical description and, on the flip side, a lack of historical specificity in theorising. To rectify these issues and further the international turn, this article argues that Leon Trotsky’s theory of uneven and combined development is a fruitful starting point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Relations
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178251319705
Primary Topic
Global Economic and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The international turn in the study of the origins of late-19th-century imperialism: achievements, limits and new directions in the theory of uneven and combined development

Huy Nguyen
International Relations
Global Economic and Social Development
article

The international turn in the study of the origins of late-19th-century imperialism: achievements, limits and new directions in the theory of uneven and combined development

Huy Nguyen
article en

Abstract

The late 19th century witnessed an unparalleled spasm of imperial expansion that redrew the world map into a handful of colonial empires. The first attempt to explain what caused this epoch was the Hobson-Lenin classical theory of imperialism. Nonetheless, over the past century, interwoven between other criticisms, many have problematised the theory’s ‘internalism’ – its negligence of the undeniable impact of interactive multi-societal co-existence (or, simply, the international) towards this outburst – and correspondingly rectified it. These critiques have constituted an international turn on the topic, which indeed seeks to incorporate the causal significance of the international. Yet, this turn faces two key limitations: an over-reliance on thick and supposedly atheoretical historical description and, on the flip side, a lack of historical specificity in theorising. To rectify these issues and further the international turn, this article argues that Leon Trotsky’s theory of uneven and combined development is a fruitful starting point.

International Relations
University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Global Economic and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.