War, solidarity and welfare attitudes: Survey evidence from the war in Ukraine

How does interstate war affect social policy preferences? Historical research has emphasised war-induced surges in demand for social protection, solidarity and fairness norms as central factors behind welfare expansion. Yet evidence for demand-side shifts remains unsystematic and restricted to a handful of Western countries. The outbreak of full-scale war in Ukraine has undoubtedly led to substantial shifts in popular attitudes. Based on original survey evidence from post-invasion Ukraine, matched with geolocated conflict data, this article seeks to elucidate the role of warfare in shaping welfare attitudes and prosocial preferences. We distinguish between two types of war impacts – proximate exposure to war violence and war-related financial deterioration – and show that these affect welfare-related attitudes differently. Whereas proximate exposure to conflict promotes national-level solidarity, war-related material victimisation is associated with higher support for social spending. Only weak support is found for an effect on fairness norms. While indicating that the historical link between warfare and demand for social policy has wider applicability, the results also underscore the variated impact of war and the resulting individual-level heterogeneity in attitudes. Finally, with the war ongoing, the Ukrainian case highlights the question of under which circumstances welfare demand may translate into policy change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2463640
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

War, solidarity and welfare attitudes: Survey evidence from the war in Ukraine

Jakob Frizell, Carina Schmitt, Herbert Obinger, Viktoriia Muliavka
3 citations
Journal of European Public Policy
Employment and Welfare Studies
8.45
article

War, solidarity and welfare attitudes: Survey evidence from the war in Ukraine

Jakob Frizell, Carina Schmitt, Herbert Obinger, Viktoriia Muliavka
article en
3 citations

Abstract

How does interstate war affect social policy preferences? Historical research has emphasised war-induced surges in demand for social protection, solidarity and fairness norms as central factors behind welfare expansion. Yet evidence for demand-side shifts remains unsystematic and restricted to a handful of Western countries. The outbreak of full-scale war in Ukraine has undoubtedly led to substantial shifts in popular attitudes. Based on original survey evidence from post-invasion Ukraine, matched with geolocated conflict data, this article seeks to elucidate the role of warfare in shaping welfare attitudes and prosocial preferences. We distinguish between two types of war impacts – proximate exposure to war violence and war-related financial deterioration – and show that these affect welfare-related attitudes differently. Whereas proximate exposure to conflict promotes national-level solidarity, war-related material victimisation is associated with higher support for social spending. Only weak support is found for an effect on fairness norms. While indicating that the historical link between warfare and demand for social policy has wider applicability, the results also underscore the variated impact of war and the resulting individual-level heterogeneity in attitudes. Finally, with the war ongoing, the Ukrainian case highlights the question of under which circumstances welfare demand may translate into policy change.

Journal of European Public Policy
University of Bremen (DE), University of Bamberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Employment and Welfare Studies
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.