The Instruments of Expeditiousness and Efficiency of the Arbitral Proceedings in the Rules of the International Arbitral Courts

Summary Currently, the emphasis in international commercial arbitration is on the speed and efficiency of arbitration proceedings in order for international commercial arbitration to maintain its position in resolving disputes in international trade. The article is based on the hypothesis that the need for permanent arbitral courts to remain competitive with state courts, whose proceedings are expedited at the national and EU level by legislation on summary proceedings, leads them to use instruments guaranteeing efficiency and speed in international arbitration. The subject of the analysis and comparison carried out in the article are recent amendments to the arbitration rules of selected permanent arbitration courts and a critical assessment of their applicability in legal practice. In particular, it compares the regulation of the preparation of the hearing of the dispute, consolidation of arbitration proceedings, on-line arbitration, remote oral hearing, and expedited proceedings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0013
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Instruments of Expeditiousness and Efficiency of the Arbitral Proceedings in the Rules of the International Arbitral Courts

Petr Dobiáš
Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The Instruments of Expeditiousness and Efficiency of the Arbitral Proceedings in the Rules of the International Arbitral Courts

Petr Dobiáš
article en

Abstract

Summary Currently, the emphasis in international commercial arbitration is on the speed and efficiency of arbitration proceedings in order for international commercial arbitration to maintain its position in resolving disputes in international trade. The article is based on the hypothesis that the need for permanent arbitral courts to remain competitive with state courts, whose proceedings are expedited at the national and EU level by legislation on summary proceedings, leads them to use instruments guaranteeing efficiency and speed in international arbitration. The subject of the analysis and comparison carried out in the article are recent amendments to the arbitration rules of selected permanent arbitration courts and a critical assessment of their applicability in legal practice. In particular, it compares the regulation of the preparation of the hearing of the dispute, consolidation of arbitration proceedings, on-line arbitration, remote oral hearing, and expedited proceedings.

Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law ReviewVol. 24(1)
CEVRO University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Instruments of Expeditiousness and Efficiency of the Arbitral Proceedings in the Rules of the International Arbitral Courts — Petr Dobiáš · Mezinárodní a srovnávací právní revue/International and Comparative Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS