Fostering English-major students’ team creativity and collaboration through design thinking

Purpose Design thinking, as a creative and innovative methodology, has been proposed as a process for non-designers to address complex problems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using design thinking to foster English-major students’ team creativity and collaboration. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a quasi-experimental design and was conducted online via Google Classroom. A purposive sample of 31 English-major students from a workplace action research class was used as participants of the study. Design thinking was introduced and employed to foster students’ team creativity and collaboration in the development of group research proposals. The four instruments used to collect the data included: team creativity questionnaire, team collaboration questionnaire, product satisfaction questionnaire and product quality questionnaire. Findings The results of the study revealed that mean scores of the four outcome variables: team creativity (4.31), team collaboration (4.20), product satisfaction (4.33) and product quality (3.87), were all at a “high” level, supporting that the approach promoted team creativity and team collaboration. Additionally, the correlations between team creativity and product satisfaction (0.49) and team collaboration and product quality (0.33) were both at a “moderate-substantial” level, potentially indicating their roles in ensuring rigorous output. Originality/value This research is significant because it provides new insights into the use of design thinking to foster students’ team creativity and collaboration in an action research course.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-07-2024-0196
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering English-major students’ team creativity and collaboration through design thinking

Chayaporn Kaoropthai
1 citations
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Design Education and Practice
0.71
article

Fostering English-major students’ team creativity and collaboration through design thinking

Chayaporn Kaoropthai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Design thinking, as a creative and innovative methodology, has been proposed as a process for non-designers to address complex problems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using design thinking to foster English-major students’ team creativity and collaboration. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a quasi-experimental design and was conducted online via Google Classroom. A purposive sample of 31 English-major students from a workplace action research class was used as participants of the study. Design thinking was introduced and employed to foster students’ team creativity and collaboration in the development of group research proposals. The four instruments used to collect the data included: team creativity questionnaire, team collaboration questionnaire, product satisfaction questionnaire and product quality questionnaire. Findings The results of the study revealed that mean scores of the four outcome variables: team creativity (4.31), team collaboration (4.20), product satisfaction (4.33) and product quality (3.87), were all at a “high” level, supporting that the approach promoted team creativity and team collaboration. Additionally, the correlations between team creativity and product satisfaction (0.49) and team collaboration and product quality (0.33) were both at a “moderate-substantial” level, potentially indicating their roles in ensuring rigorous output. Originality/value This research is significant because it provides new insights into the use of design thinking to foster students’ team creativity and collaboration in an action research course.

Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Design Education and Practice
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fostering English-major students’ team creativity and collaboration through design thinking — Chayaporn Kaoropthai · Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS