Economic viability of robotic fruit harvesters to reduce large seasonal labor demands: Analysis of Gala and Honeycrisp apples

Abstract Fruit harvesting is labor intensive and relies heavily on a decreasing immigrant farm labor supply. This study develops a model to compare robotic and manual apple‐harvesting profits. Given the anticipated performance of robotic prototypes, we find that a grower could spend $248.42 per acre per year on a robotic harvester and obtain the same profit as manual harvest. Marginal improvements in the percent of fruit harvested, harvester speed, and robot‐induced damage would greatly enhance robot profitability and farmers could spend more on the harvester and still obtain the same profit as manual harvest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.70000
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Banana Cultivation and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic viability of robotic fruit harvesters to reduce large seasonal labor demands: Analysis of Gala and Honeycrisp apples

Stephen Devadoss, Stavros George Vougioukas, Diane Charlton, Jeff Luckstead et al.
1 citations
Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
Banana Cultivation and Research
1.75
article

Economic viability of robotic fruit harvesters to reduce large seasonal labor demands: Analysis of Gala and Honeycrisp apples

Stephen Devadoss, Stavros George Vougioukas, Diane Charlton, Jeff Luckstead, Rosa Karina Gallardo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fruit harvesting is labor intensive and relies heavily on a decreasing immigrant farm labor supply. This study develops a model to compare robotic and manual apple‐harvesting profits. Given the anticipated performance of robotic prototypes, we find that a grower could spend $248.42 per acre per year on a robotic harvester and obtain the same profit as manual harvest. Marginal improvements in the percent of fruit harvested, harvester speed, and robot‐induced damage would greatly enhance robot profitability and farmers could spend more on the harvester and still obtain the same profit as manual harvest.

Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics AssociationVol. 4(1)
Texas Tech University (US), Montana State University (US), Washington State University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Banana Cultivation and Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.