Calvin and the Age of the Earth

Abstract This article presents three assumptions that underlie the claim that Calvin would support or adhere to the young earth view if he were alive in the twentieth or twenty first century. The argument for the claim that Calvin provides support for the twentieth-century young earth view is untenable. Calvin does not make assertions that can be appealed to as substantial support for the young earth view. To support this position we present three counterarguments to the three underlying assumptions we briefly presented above, regarding Calvin’s own assertions concerning the six days of creation, his accommodation theory, and his commonality with his contemporaries. Although Calvin might have held the view of six literal days, as he was evidently opposing the instantaneous creation theory of his time, he does not provide as much support for the twentieth-century literal six days view as young earth creationists might expect. Attempting to align Calvin’s view of the creation days with the twentieth-century debate is not only unwarranted but also does not do justice to Calvin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reformed Theology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15697312-bja10052
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calvin and the Age of the Earth

Bobby Kurnia Putrawan, Yuzo Adhinarta, Agus Santoso
Journal of Reformed Theology
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

Calvin and the Age of the Earth

Bobby Kurnia Putrawan, Yuzo Adhinarta, Agus Santoso
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents three assumptions that underlie the claim that Calvin would support or adhere to the young earth view if he were alive in the twentieth or twenty first century. The argument for the claim that Calvin provides support for the twentieth-century young earth view is untenable. Calvin does not make assertions that can be appealed to as substantial support for the young earth view. To support this position we present three counterarguments to the three underlying assumptions we briefly presented above, regarding Calvin’s own assertions concerning the six days of creation, his accommodation theory, and his commonality with his contemporaries. Although Calvin might have held the view of six literal days, as he was evidently opposing the instantaneous creation theory of his time, he does not provide as much support for the twentieth-century literal six days view as young earth creationists might expect. Attempting to align Calvin’s view of the creation days with the twentieth-century debate is not only unwarranted but also does not do justice to Calvin.

Journal of Reformed TheologyVol. 19(1-2)
Jakarta Theological Seminary (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Calvin and the Age of the Earth — Bobby Kurnia Putrawan, Yuzo Adhinarta, et al. · Journal of Reformed Theology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS