Reading comprehension assessment for student selection: advantages of text availability in terms of validity

Reading comprehension assessments are widely used in university entrance exams across various fields. These tests vary in text content, answer format, and whether the text remains available while the questions are being answered. We explored how the availability of the text impacts the psychometric quality of the test and what is the best format for assessing reading comprehension in university admissions. We developed a test with four educational texts and 88 questions. A group of 107 university students was tested on two texts under two conditions: with and without text availability, using identical true/false questions for both scenarios. Results show similar difficulties in both versions, but slightly higher item-total correlations and internal consistencies in the text-unavailable condition, although this varied between texts. The text-available condition showed better validity, with expected correlations with participants’ verbal intelligence and language scores. Overall, allowing text access during the test appears to be advantageous for assessing reading comprehension in university admissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1524561
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading comprehension assessment for student selection: advantages of text availability in terms of validity

Barbara Weißenbacher, Paul Sedlmayr
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
article

Reading comprehension assessment for student selection: advantages of text availability in terms of validity

Barbara Weißenbacher, Paul Sedlmayr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reading comprehension assessments are widely used in university entrance exams across various fields. These tests vary in text content, answer format, and whether the text remains available while the questions are being answered. We explored how the availability of the text impacts the psychometric quality of the test and what is the best format for assessing reading comprehension in university admissions. We developed a test with four educational texts and 88 questions. A group of 107 university students was tested on two texts under two conditions: with and without text availability, using identical true/false questions for both scenarios. Results show similar difficulties in both versions, but slightly higher item-total correlations and internal consistencies in the text-unavailable condition, although this varied between texts. The text-available condition showed better validity, with expected correlations with participants’ verbal intelligence and language scores. Overall, allowing text access during the test appears to be advantageous for assessing reading comprehension in university admissions.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading comprehension assessment for student selection: advantages of text availability in terms of validity — Barbara Weißenbacher, Paul Sedlmayr · Frontiers in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS