The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm

A change is slowly occurring in the ways healthcare responds to patients after they experience harm. The imperative to be transparent with patients and families has been accepted as a key element of high quality, safe and patient-centered healthcare. The language used to describe the experience of the people impacted by harm events is also evolving, recognizing that certain words can help or hinder the experience of patients affected by harm. The language describing these efforts is shifting from legal and institutional terminology to more inclusive terms recognizing broader groups impacted by harm. We describe the evolution of language regarding harm response and make recommendations for the future of the field. While our observations on language are specific to the terminology used in the United States, the concept of moving to more patient-centered language is universal. Other countries should make similar reviews to use more patient-centered language when discussing patient harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm

Evan M. Benjamin, Carole Hemmelgarn, A. Peterson, Leilani Schweitzer et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Health Services
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm

Evan M. Benjamin, Carole Hemmelgarn, A. Peterson, Leilani Schweitzer, Stephanie Calcasola, Jerry O. Bradley, Francis Korn, P. Lodato
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A change is slowly occurring in the ways healthcare responds to patients after they experience harm. The imperative to be transparent with patients and families has been accepted as a key element of high quality, safe and patient-centered healthcare. The language used to describe the experience of the people impacted by harm events is also evolving, recognizing that certain words can help or hinder the experience of patients affected by harm. The language describing these efforts is shifting from legal and institutional terminology to more inclusive terms recognizing broader groups impacted by harm. We describe the evolution of language regarding harm response and make recommendations for the future of the field. While our observations on language are specific to the terminology used in the United States, the concept of moving to more patient-centered language is universal. Other countries should make similar reviews to use more patient-centered language when discussing patient harm.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 5
Dartmouth College (US), Hartford Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US), Ariadne Diagnostics (United States) (US), Dartmouth Health (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm — Evan M. Benjamin, Carole Hemmelgarn, et al. · Frontiers in Health Services (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS