Measuring Corporate Compliance with the SDGs Based on the GRI’s ESG Reporting Methodology

Background: This research examines the efficiency of ESG reporting in corporate contributions toward achieving the SDGs, relative to the literature gaps and sectoral differences in reporting practices. It also highlights that full ESG disclosure is invariably instrumental in ensuring corporate transparency and accountability. Methods: The study used the GRI framework to analyze SDG compliance in sustainability reports from companies in the technology, automotive, energy, and health sectors. Results: Key findings include significant variations in SDG compliance across industries: the automotive sector demonstrated the highest compliance at 85%, while the technology sector showed the lowest at 49%. The study also found a notable difference between reported and substantiated SDGs, indicating that many companies engage in ‘rainbow washing’ or ‘cherry-picking’ SDGs to fit their agendas without fully integrating them into their strategies. The research concludes that although the GRI framework provide. Conclusions: The study urges the combination of other standards, such as ESRS and SASB, together with more intense regulatory frameworks and industry-specific guidelines to increase comparability and the credibility of the reports on sustainability.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainability Research
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250010
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Corporate Compliance with the SDGs Based on the GRI’s ESG Reporting Methodology

Journal of Sustainability Research
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Measuring Corporate Compliance with the SDGs Based on the GRI’s ESG Reporting Methodology

article en

Abstract

Background: This research examines the efficiency of ESG reporting in corporate contributions toward achieving the SDGs, relative to the literature gaps and sectoral differences in reporting practices. It also highlights that full ESG disclosure is invariably instrumental in ensuring corporate transparency and accountability. Methods: The study used the GRI framework to analyze SDG compliance in sustainability reports from companies in the technology, automotive, energy, and health sectors. Results: Key findings include significant variations in SDG compliance across industries: the automotive sector demonstrated the highest compliance at 85%, while the technology sector showed the lowest at 49%. The study also found a notable difference between reported and substantiated SDGs, indicating that many companies engage in ‘rainbow washing’ or ‘cherry-picking’ SDGs to fit their agendas without fully integrating them into their strategies. The research concludes that although the GRI framework provide. Conclusions: The study urges the combination of other standards, such as ESRS and SASB, together with more intense regulatory frameworks and industry-specific guidelines to increase comparability and the credibility of the reports on sustainability.

Journal of Sustainability ResearchVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.