Investigating the use of multiple representations in university courses on quantum technologies

Abstract The field of Quantum Information Science and Technology (QIST) education presents unique challenges for both students and educators, such as the necessity of understanding abstract properties of quantum systems. To provide a more intuitive understanding of quantum systems, a multitude of qubit representations have been developed in recent years. Given the diversity of the field, a specific representation may be more suitable in one content area of than in another. Consequently, the choice of representation may vary considerably depending on the course orientation. However, no exhaustive analysis has been conducted into the differences between the representation of single- and multi-qubit systems in higher education QIST courses. Furthermore, the factors which influence the selection of a suitable representation remain open. To close this gap, we conducted an online survey with 25 educators at different German and Austrian universities on their use of representations in QIST-related courses. The results confirm the pivotal role of mathematical formalism in QIST education regardless of the specific course characteristics but also reveal an untapped potential for enhancing student learning through the intentional and comprehensive use of multiple external representations (MERs), especially in the case of multi-qubit systems. The findings are discussed within the context of the field of QIST and current insights into learning with MERs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Quantum Technology
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00327-4
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the use of multiple representations in university courses on quantum technologies

Eva Rexigel, Jochen Kühn, Stefan Küchemann, Linda Qerimi et al.
5 citations
EPJ Quantum Technology
Various Chemistry Research Topics
8.76
article

Investigating the use of multiple representations in university courses on quantum technologies

Eva Rexigel, Jochen Kühn, Stefan Küchemann, Linda Qerimi, Artur Widera, Jonas Bley, Alda Arias
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The field of Quantum Information Science and Technology (QIST) education presents unique challenges for both students and educators, such as the necessity of understanding abstract properties of quantum systems. To provide a more intuitive understanding of quantum systems, a multitude of qubit representations have been developed in recent years. Given the diversity of the field, a specific representation may be more suitable in one content area of than in another. Consequently, the choice of representation may vary considerably depending on the course orientation. However, no exhaustive analysis has been conducted into the differences between the representation of single- and multi-qubit systems in higher education QIST courses. Furthermore, the factors which influence the selection of a suitable representation remain open. To close this gap, we conducted an online survey with 25 educators at different German and Austrian universities on their use of representations in QIST-related courses. The results confirm the pivotal role of mathematical formalism in QIST education regardless of the specific course characteristics but also reveal an untapped potential for enhancing student learning through the intentional and comprehensive use of multiple external representations (MERs), especially in the case of multi-qubit systems. The findings are discussed within the context of the field of QIST and current insights into learning with MERs.

EPJ Quantum TechnologyVol. 12(1)
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
8.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.