Meaning-Making in Grief Work and Where We Stand Today

Grief has seen developments in conceptualization and treatment over the course of 60 years. This paper provides an analysis of the historical developments in thanatology. While in the early 1900s, grief was viewed as a universal process of detachment and severing emotional connections from the deceased, literature has evolved to conceptualize grief from a sociocultural perspective, emphasizing the personal and social construction of meaning. By culminating knowledge of what we know and what we practice, the paper aims to explore steps that need to be taken in the field of grief work to account for the needs of diverse cultural backgrounds and support a healthy grieving process, especially after the mental health concerns due to complex grieving during the COVID-19 pandemic. By specifically discussing the importance of meaning-making in grief work, this paper will highlight the changes in grief conceptualization from an objective stagewise model to sociocultural frameworks of grief. Additionally, this paper will also discuss what counselor-education programs currently teach in alignment with new literature and offer suggestions on how programs can update education in trauma-informed care, particularly grief.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Illness Crisis & Loss
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373251318126
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meaning-Making in Grief Work and Where We Stand Today

Kriti Gaur
Illness Crisis & Loss
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

Meaning-Making in Grief Work and Where We Stand Today

Kriti Gaur
article en

Abstract

Grief has seen developments in conceptualization and treatment over the course of 60 years. This paper provides an analysis of the historical developments in thanatology. While in the early 1900s, grief was viewed as a universal process of detachment and severing emotional connections from the deceased, literature has evolved to conceptualize grief from a sociocultural perspective, emphasizing the personal and social construction of meaning. By culminating knowledge of what we know and what we practice, the paper aims to explore steps that need to be taken in the field of grief work to account for the needs of diverse cultural backgrounds and support a healthy grieving process, especially after the mental health concerns due to complex grieving during the COVID-19 pandemic. By specifically discussing the importance of meaning-making in grief work, this paper will highlight the changes in grief conceptualization from an objective stagewise model to sociocultural frameworks of grief. Additionally, this paper will also discuss what counselor-education programs currently teach in alignment with new literature and offer suggestions on how programs can update education in trauma-informed care, particularly grief.

Illness Crisis & LossVol. 34(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.