Evaluating the feasibility of using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy framework to assess implementation strategies for digital mental health applications activations: a proof of concept study

These findings support the feasibility of using the MOST to evaluate implementation strategies in digital mental health care. It also gives an exploratory example on how to conduct factorial designs with information on implementation strategies. However, limitations such as non-random assignment, underpowered analysis, and varying approaches to HCPs affect the robustness and generalizability of the results. Despite these limitations, the results demonstrate that the MOST is a viable method for assessing implementation strategies, highlighting the importance of planning and optimizing strategies before their implementation. By addressing these limitations, healthcare providers and policymakers can enhance the adoption of digital health innovations, ultimately improving access to mental health care for a broader population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Digital Health
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1509415
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the feasibility of using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy framework to assess implementation strategies for digital mental health applications activations: a proof of concept study

Ilja Cornelisz, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Anne Etzelmueller, Ayla Aydın
1 links
Frontiers in Digital Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Evaluating the feasibility of using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy framework to assess implementation strategies for digital mental health applications activations: a proof of concept study

Ilja Cornelisz, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Anne Etzelmueller, Ayla Aydın
article en

Abstract

These findings support the feasibility of using the MOST to evaluate implementation strategies in digital mental health care. It also gives an exploratory example on how to conduct factorial designs with information on implementation strategies. However, limitations such as non-random assignment, underpowered analysis, and varying approaches to HCPs affect the robustness and generalizability of the results. Despite these limitations, the results demonstrate that the MOST is a viable method for assessing implementation strategies, highlighting the importance of planning and optimizing strategies before their implementation. By addressing these limitations, healthcare providers and policymakers can enhance the adoption of digital health innovations, ultimately improving access to mental health care for a broader population.

Frontiers in Digital HealthVol. 7
Gesundes Kinzigtal (Germany) (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.