The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble those of spatial cognition more than language processing

The ability to use logical-mathematical symbols (LMS), encompassing tasks such as calculation, reasoning, and programming, is special to humans with recent emergence. LMS processing was suggested to build upon fundamental cognitive systems through neuronal recycling, with natural language processing and spatial cognition as key candidates. This study used meta-analyses and synthesized neural maps of representative LMS tasks, including reasoning, calculation, and mental programming, to compare their neural correlates with those of the two systems. Our results revealed greater activation overlap and multivariate similarity between LMS and spatial cognition than with language processing. Hierarchical clustering further indicated that LMS tasks were indistinguishable from spatial tasks at the neural level, suggesting an inherent connection. Our findings support the hypothesis that spatial cognition is the basis of LMS processing, shedding light on the logical reasoning limitations of large language models, particularly those lacking explicit spatial representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble those of spatial cognition more than language processing

Yuannan Li, Jia Liu, Shan Xu
1 citations
iScience
Neural Networks and Applications
2.48
article

The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble those of spatial cognition more than language processing

Yuannan Li, Jia Liu, Shan Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The ability to use logical-mathematical symbols (LMS), encompassing tasks such as calculation, reasoning, and programming, is special to humans with recent emergence. LMS processing was suggested to build upon fundamental cognitive systems through neuronal recycling, with natural language processing and spatial cognition as key candidates. This study used meta-analyses and synthesized neural maps of representative LMS tasks, including reasoning, calculation, and mental programming, to compare their neural correlates with those of the two systems. Our results revealed greater activation overlap and multivariate similarity between LMS and spatial cognition than with language processing. Hierarchical clustering further indicated that LMS tasks were indistinguishable from spatial tasks at the neural level, suggesting an inherent connection. Our findings support the hypothesis that spatial cognition is the basis of LMS processing, shedding light on the logical reasoning limitations of large language models, particularly those lacking explicit spatial representations.

iScienceVol. 28(4)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Neural Networks and Applications
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble those of spatial cognition more than language processing — Yuannan Li, Jia Liu, et al. · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS