Destabilize/Stabilize Approach to Experimental Active Flutter Suppression Technology Development

Testing aeroelastic systems close to, at, and beyond their flutter speeds is extremely important for the experimental development of active flutter suppression technology. Such tests make possible the identification, based on input/output measurements, and, in turn, the fine tuning of aeroservoelastic-system mathematical models that would serve as a basis for designing control laws for flutter suppression and for a variety of other active control tasks, such as gust alleviation and ride comfort improvement. Such tests, however, are dangerous, costly, and, in many cases, not possible. This paper presents a safe wind-tunnel and flight-test technique in which, out of an array of multiple control surfaces, some are used, via closed-loop control, to generate deliberate instabilities of desired nature as well as desired dynamic characteristics of an aeroservoelastic system to be studied, whereas other control surfaces are used for the development of the active control technology required to meet active control targets for the resulting systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008589
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Real-time simulation and control systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Destabilize/Stabilize Approach to Experimental Active Flutter Suppression Technology Development

Kristi A. Morgansen, John Berg, Kuang-Ying Ting, Eli Livne
1 citations
Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics
Real-time simulation and control systems
1.21
article

Destabilize/Stabilize Approach to Experimental Active Flutter Suppression Technology Development

Kristi A. Morgansen, John Berg, Kuang-Ying Ting, Eli Livne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Testing aeroelastic systems close to, at, and beyond their flutter speeds is extremely important for the experimental development of active flutter suppression technology. Such tests make possible the identification, based on input/output measurements, and, in turn, the fine tuning of aeroservoelastic-system mathematical models that would serve as a basis for designing control laws for flutter suppression and for a variety of other active control tasks, such as gust alleviation and ride comfort improvement. Such tests, however, are dangerous, costly, and, in many cases, not possible. This paper presents a safe wind-tunnel and flight-test technique in which, out of an array of multiple control surfaces, some are used, via closed-loop control, to generate deliberate instabilities of desired nature as well as desired dynamic characteristics of an aeroservoelastic system to be studied, whereas other control surfaces are used for the development of the active control technology required to meet active control targets for the resulting systems.

Journal of Guidance Control and DynamicsVol. 48(5)
University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Real-time simulation and control systems
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Destabilize/Stabilize Approach to Experimental Active Flutter Suppression Technology Development — Kristi A. Morgansen, John Berg, et al. · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS