Trends in Political Science Research: <i>Affective Polarization</i>

This article provides a systematic review of the literature on affective polarization, emphasizing its emotional, identity-based, and systemic dimensions across diverse political contexts. It examines the current state of research, revealing the phenomenon’s manifestations in both multiparty and two-party systems, and highlights key drivers such as identity dynamics, moral conviction, and media influences. The article identifies significant gaps in conceptual clarity and mitigation strategies, particularly concerning entrenched partisanship. Through the synthesis of various methodological approaches and the provision of a comparative perspective, this work emphasizes the implications of affective polarization on social trust, democratic governance, and political stability, thereby offering actionable insights for scholars and policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Science Abstracts
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345251323534
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in Political Science Research: Affective Polarization

Tamanna M. Shah
3 citations
International Political Science Abstracts
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
25.57
article

Trends in Political Science Research: Affective Polarization

Tamanna M. Shah
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article provides a systematic review of the literature on affective polarization, emphasizing its emotional, identity-based, and systemic dimensions across diverse political contexts. It examines the current state of research, revealing the phenomenon’s manifestations in both multiparty and two-party systems, and highlights key drivers such as identity dynamics, moral conviction, and media influences. The article identifies significant gaps in conceptual clarity and mitigation strategies, particularly concerning entrenched partisanship. Through the synthesis of various methodological approaches and the provision of a comparative perspective, this work emphasizes the implications of affective polarization on social trust, democratic governance, and political stability, thereby offering actionable insights for scholars and policymakers.

International Political Science AbstractsVol. 75(1)
Ohio University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trends in Political Science Research: <i>Affective Polarization</i> — Tamanna M. Shah · International Political Science Abstracts (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS