In Search of a Neural Mechanism for Domain-General Value Comparison in Decision Making

Decision making requires comparing the costs and benefits associated with available options. Decision costs include the expected effort to be exerted, whether cognitive or physical. Benefits, on the other hand, include the anticipated reward or positive outcome of the decision (Kurzban et al., 2013). For example, if you feel hungry during the day, you might opt for a quick snack to satisfy your hunger temporarily, or you could invest the additional effort to prepare a well-rounded meal. Despite the importance of effort-based decision making in everyday life, it remains unclear how the brain resolves the tension between maximizing reward and minimizing costs to come to a decision. Designing experiments to study decision making in the brain requires consideration of factors such as valuation comparison (i.e., the relative value of the options) and decision difficulty. Studying decision making as an effort–reward trade-off is further complicated by phenomena such as effort discounting (i.e., the devaluation of rewards as cognitive effort increases) and the subjective value of rewards (Apps et al., 2015). Considering all these factors, it is perhaps unsurprising that the neural mechanisms involved in effort-based decision making remain an area of active investigation, as well as a topic of broad interest in daily life. From a mechanistic perspective, cost–benefit decision making requires dynamic assessment of estimated effort expenditure and expected reward, both of which are subjective and can fluctuate over time. The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) has been identified as a candidate area for encoding aspects of effort-based decision making in humans and rodents (Westbrook et al., 2019). dACC is located in the midcingulate cortex in the medial surface of the frontal lobe and is connected to regions involved in cognitive control, executive function, and decision making (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and … Correspondence should be addressed to Ahmad Samara at asamara1{at}student.ubc.ca.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2233-24.2025
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Search of a Neural Mechanism for Domain-General Value Comparison in Decision Making

Zaid Zada, Ahmad Samara
Journal of Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

In Search of a Neural Mechanism for Domain-General Value Comparison in Decision Making

Zaid Zada, Ahmad Samara
article en

Abstract

Decision making requires comparing the costs and benefits associated with available options. Decision costs include the expected effort to be exerted, whether cognitive or physical. Benefits, on the other hand, include the anticipated reward or positive outcome of the decision (Kurzban et al., 2013). For example, if you feel hungry during the day, you might opt for a quick snack to satisfy your hunger temporarily, or you could invest the additional effort to prepare a well-rounded meal. Despite the importance of effort-based decision making in everyday life, it remains unclear how the brain resolves the tension between maximizing reward and minimizing costs to come to a decision. Designing experiments to study decision making in the brain requires consideration of factors such as valuation comparison (i.e., the relative value of the options) and decision difficulty. Studying decision making as an effort–reward trade-off is further complicated by phenomena such as effort discounting (i.e., the devaluation of rewards as cognitive effort increases) and the subjective value of rewards (Apps et al., 2015). Considering all these factors, it is perhaps unsurprising that the neural mechanisms involved in effort-based decision making remain an area of active investigation, as well as a topic of broad interest in daily life. From a mechanistic perspective, cost–benefit decision making requires dynamic assessment of estimated effort expenditure and expected reward, both of which are subjective and can fluctuate over time. The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) has been identified as a candidate area for encoding aspects of effort-based decision making in humans and rodents (Westbrook et al., 2019). dACC is located in the midcingulate cortex in the medial surface of the frontal lobe and is connected to regions involved in cognitive control, executive function, and decision making (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and … Correspondence should be addressed to Ahmad Samara at asamara1{at}student.ubc.ca.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 45(7)
University of British Columbia (CA), Princeton University (US)
BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.