How to Interpret what is Given: Revelation and Hermeneutics in Jean‐Luc Marion

Abstract The most significant gift of Jean‐Luc Marion’s work to the worlds of phenomenology, theology, and religious studies is the provision of a thinking which begins with givenness: the thought of a given which, arriving from “elsewhere,” escapes the determining limits of the one who receives it and, thus, a gift which reveals itself starting from itself. Given this starting point, the question of this article is whether there is a genuine role for hermeneutics in Marion’s understanding of phenomenology, especially as seen in his most recent discussions of revelation. If so, can it be made to cohere with his more fundamental phenomenological methodology, specifically the reduction to “pure givenness” which is meant to deliver phenomena without the constituting influence of a subjective knower? Can he make room for the role of interpretation without jeopardizing that which he seeks to guarantee: the appearance (or arrival) of the given on its own terms?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Theology
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12983
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Interpret what is Given: Revelation and Hermeneutics in Jean‐Luc Marion

Tamsin Jones
1 citations
Modern Theology
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
17.27
article

How to Interpret what is Given: Revelation and Hermeneutics in Jean‐Luc Marion

Tamsin Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The most significant gift of Jean‐Luc Marion’s work to the worlds of phenomenology, theology, and religious studies is the provision of a thinking which begins with givenness: the thought of a given which, arriving from “elsewhere,” escapes the determining limits of the one who receives it and, thus, a gift which reveals itself starting from itself. Given this starting point, the question of this article is whether there is a genuine role for hermeneutics in Marion’s understanding of phenomenology, especially as seen in his most recent discussions of revelation. If so, can it be made to cohere with his more fundamental phenomenological methodology, specifically the reduction to “pure givenness” which is meant to deliver phenomena without the constituting influence of a subjective knower? Can he make room for the role of interpretation without jeopardizing that which he seeks to guarantee: the appearance (or arrival) of the given on its own terms?

Modern TheologyVol. 42(1)
College Summit (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States), Trinity College (US)
Templeton Religion Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.