Addressing the Gaps in Mixed Research Methods in Rwanda: A Critical Perspective

Mixed Research Methods (MRM), which combine both qualitative and quantitative techniques, present an effective approach for tackling intricate research inquiries. However, despite their widespread use, MRM continues to face numerous challenges that hinder the overall quality and reliability of research. This article thoroughly examines several critical issues in MRM, including difficulties in merging data, lack of clear methodological processes, researcher bias, and the scarcity of interdisciplinary expertise. Through a combination of literature review and fieldwork experience from health sciences, education, and public health research conducted in Rwanda, we propose practical strategies to bridge these challenges. We emphasize the importance of refining methodological frameworks, increasing training, fostering researcher reflexivity, and establishing clearer ethical protocols to enhance MRM in future research endeavors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Health Ethics
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63101/gjhe.v1i1.005
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Gaps in Mixed Research Methods in Rwanda: A Critical Perspective

Amos HABIMANA
Global Journal of Health Ethics
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Addressing the Gaps in Mixed Research Methods in Rwanda: A Critical Perspective

Amos HABIMANA
article en

Abstract

Mixed Research Methods (MRM), which combine both qualitative and quantitative techniques, present an effective approach for tackling intricate research inquiries. However, despite their widespread use, MRM continues to face numerous challenges that hinder the overall quality and reliability of research. This article thoroughly examines several critical issues in MRM, including difficulties in merging data, lack of clear methodological processes, researcher bias, and the scarcity of interdisciplinary expertise. Through a combination of literature review and fieldwork experience from health sciences, education, and public health research conducted in Rwanda, we propose practical strategies to bridge these challenges. We emphasize the importance of refining methodological frameworks, increasing training, fostering researcher reflexivity, and establishing clearer ethical protocols to enhance MRM in future research endeavors.

Global Journal of Health EthicsVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.