China’s Urban–Rural and Trade Inequality in Water Footprint

The economic inequalities impede the equal distribution of water among various household groups, potentially leading to inequal access to this vital resource. By integrating a multi-regional input–output model with household expenditure, we investigate the water footprint (WF) for ten income groups in each of the provinces and evaluate water inequality among regions, households, and expenditure categories comprehensively. Our findings reveal significant disparities in water footprints, with urban households exhibiting nearly three times the WF of rural residents. Wealthier eastern provinces show higher per capita consumption-based WFs compared to the less developed western regions. The interregional trade exacerbates water inequality because water-intensive goods are produced in less developed regions and are being consumed in more developed provinces. This study underscores the importance of targeted policies to address water inequality, achieve sustainable water management, and promote equitable water use in the face of increasing water demand and supply imbalances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040531
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Urban–Rural and Trade Inequality in Water Footprint

Yonghua Li, Gang Liu
2 citations
Water
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
article

China’s Urban–Rural and Trade Inequality in Water Footprint

Yonghua Li, Gang Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The economic inequalities impede the equal distribution of water among various household groups, potentially leading to inequal access to this vital resource. By integrating a multi-regional input–output model with household expenditure, we investigate the water footprint (WF) for ten income groups in each of the provinces and evaluate water inequality among regions, households, and expenditure categories comprehensively. Our findings reveal significant disparities in water footprints, with urban households exhibiting nearly three times the WF of rural residents. Wealthier eastern provinces show higher per capita consumption-based WFs compared to the less developed western regions. The interregional trade exacerbates water inequality because water-intensive goods are produced in less developed regions and are being consumed in more developed provinces. This study underscores the importance of targeted policies to address water inequality, achieve sustainable water management, and promote equitable water use in the face of increasing water demand and supply imbalances.

WaterVol. 17(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
Capital University of Economics and Business
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Urban–Rural and Trade Inequality in Water Footprint — Yonghua Li, Gang Liu · Water (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS