Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering

Systems-of-systems are often characterized as systems where the constituent parts have some independence from the whole. Recent research has aimed at clarifying in more detail what this independence means. It has shown that independence requires the constituent systems to be agents that observe the system-of-systems from within and construct internal models of it as a basis for decisions. This view on observers as parts of the system-of-systems parallels development in the field of second-order cybernetics several decades ago, yet the connection between that field and systems-of-systems has not been explored previously. This paper, therefore, summarizes key concepts from second-order cybernetics, including the subtopic autopoiesis. It then discusses what the implications are on systems-of-systems engineering through the identification of 17 concerns. These concerns relate to the physical topology, behavior, and control of the system-of-systems. This paper shows how these concerns directly relate to the theoretical concepts of second-order cybernetics and autopoiesis, and thereby, opens the door to further exploitation of this theoretical foundation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020119
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering

Jakob Axelsson
3 citations
Systems
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
3.64
article

Implications of Second-Order Cybernetics and Autopoiesis on Systems-of-Systems Engineering

Jakob Axelsson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Systems-of-systems are often characterized as systems where the constituent parts have some independence from the whole. Recent research has aimed at clarifying in more detail what this independence means. It has shown that independence requires the constituent systems to be agents that observe the system-of-systems from within and construct internal models of it as a basis for decisions. This view on observers as parts of the system-of-systems parallels development in the field of second-order cybernetics several decades ago, yet the connection between that field and systems-of-systems has not been explored previously. This paper, therefore, summarizes key concepts from second-order cybernetics, including the subtopic autopoiesis. It then discusses what the implications are on systems-of-systems engineering through the identification of 17 concerns. These concerns relate to the physical topology, behavior, and control of the system-of-systems. This paper shows how these concerns directly relate to the theoretical concepts of second-order cybernetics and autopoiesis, and thereby, opens the door to further exploitation of this theoretical foundation.

SystemsVol. 13(2)
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), Mälardalen University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.