Determining the Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

A field experiment was conducted at the Instructional cum Research Farm, IGKV, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, India, to evaluate the effect of different weed management practices on yield and economic returns of wheat during the Rabi season of 2020-21. The experiment, laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications, included five treatments: hand hoeing at 30 days after sowing (DAS) (T1), metribuzin application @ 175 g a.i. ha-1 at 20 DAS (T2), one hand weeding at 20 DAS (T3), two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T4), and an absolute control (T5). Results revealed that two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS registered highest grain yield (21.38 q ha⁻¹) and straw yield (45.63 q ha-¹), followed by metribuzin application (grain yield of 18.60 q ha⁻¹ and straw yield of 43.26 q ha-¹). Economic analysis revealed that two hand weeding yielded highest gross returns (73,624 ₹ ha-1) and net returns (53,492 ₹ ha-1) but incurred a higher cost of cultivation (20,132 ₹ ha-1) due to increased labor requirements. Metribuzin, though slightly less effective in terms of yield, provided a cost-effective alternative with a lower cost of cultivation (14,004 ₹ ha⁻¹), high net return (49,794 ₹ ha⁻¹) and higher B:C ratio (3.56) making it suitable for situations with labor scarcity. In conclusion, two hand weedings maximize yield and returns in labor-available areas, while metribuzin offers practically cost-effective alternative when labours are scarce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i23268
Primary Topic
Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

A. Pradhan, A. John, G. Naveen Kumar, K. Mani et al.
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Agricultural Science and Fertilization
article

Determining the Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

A. Pradhan, A. John, G. Naveen Kumar, K. Mani, Nagender Gaddala, Kiranlata Manikpuri
article en

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Instructional cum Research Farm, IGKV, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, India, to evaluate the effect of different weed management practices on yield and economic returns of wheat during the Rabi season of 2020-21. The experiment, laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications, included five treatments: hand hoeing at 30 days after sowing (DAS) (T1), metribuzin application @ 175 g a.i. ha-1 at 20 DAS (T2), one hand weeding at 20 DAS (T3), two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T4), and an absolute control (T5). Results revealed that two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS registered highest grain yield (21.38 q ha⁻¹) and straw yield (45.63 q ha-¹), followed by metribuzin application (grain yield of 18.60 q ha⁻¹ and straw yield of 43.26 q ha-¹). Economic analysis revealed that two hand weeding yielded highest gross returns (73,624 ₹ ha-1) and net returns (53,492 ₹ ha-1) but incurred a higher cost of cultivation (20,132 ₹ ha-1) due to increased labor requirements. Metribuzin, though slightly less effective in terms of yield, provided a cost-effective alternative with a lower cost of cultivation (14,004 ₹ ha⁻¹), high net return (49,794 ₹ ha⁻¹) and higher B:C ratio (3.56) making it suitable for situations with labor scarcity. In conclusion, two hand weedings maximize yield and returns in labor-available areas, while metribuzin offers practically cost-effective alternative when labours are scarce.

Journal of Experimental Agriculture InternationalVol. 47(2)
University of Agricultural Sciences Raichur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Agricultural Science and Fertilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.