Revising Flood Return Periods by Accounting for the Co‐Occurrence Between Floods and Their Potential Drivers

ABSTRACT The return period of floods can be influenced by the extreme values of their potential drivers, which may vary among catchments. Understanding the risk and the associated changes in return periods due to these extreme values of drivers is therefore of interest in flood hydrology. In this study, floods are considered as compound events resulting from a combination of non‐independent factors. The return periods of these events are estimated using joint distribution functions, accounting for the dependence of flood peaks and their potential drivers in two distinct catchments: (i) an inland catchment‐Warunji Catchment, Krishna basin, India, and (ii) a coastal catchment‐Usk catchment, United Kingdom (UK). The annual maximum (AM) rainfall, soil moisture and storm surge are considered as potential drivers of floods and their variations in time of occurrence are calculated to understand co‐occurrence patterns. The pairwise co‐occurrence frequency and dependence are estimated, and joint distribution is calculated with the survival copula distribution function. The results indicate that AM values of the variables tend to co‐occur within a short time window, signifying that the flood risk changes with the extreme values of drivers. The maximum values of the AM series of drivers are observed in the same year as the largest flood in the series. The joint return periods of flood events show significant variations from their univariate estimates in both catchments, which have different flood‐generating mechanisms. This work re‐emphasises the findings in recent literature that the traditional univariate risk assessment methods based only on flood peak information may substantially underestimate/overestimate the risk of floods by neglecting the effects of their potential drivers and that a multivariate viewpoint is imperative for assessing the risk of floods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8783
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revising Flood Return Periods by Accounting for the Co‐Occurrence Between Floods and Their Potential Drivers

Rajarshi Das Bhowmik, P. P. Mujumdar, Kanneganti Bhargav Kumar
1 citations
International Journal of Climatology
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

Revising Flood Return Periods by Accounting for the Co‐Occurrence Between Floods and Their Potential Drivers

Rajarshi Das Bhowmik, P. P. Mujumdar, Kanneganti Bhargav Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The return period of floods can be influenced by the extreme values of their potential drivers, which may vary among catchments. Understanding the risk and the associated changes in return periods due to these extreme values of drivers is therefore of interest in flood hydrology. In this study, floods are considered as compound events resulting from a combination of non‐independent factors. The return periods of these events are estimated using joint distribution functions, accounting for the dependence of flood peaks and their potential drivers in two distinct catchments: (i) an inland catchment‐Warunji Catchment, Krishna basin, India, and (ii) a coastal catchment‐Usk catchment, United Kingdom (UK). The annual maximum (AM) rainfall, soil moisture and storm surge are considered as potential drivers of floods and their variations in time of occurrence are calculated to understand co‐occurrence patterns. The pairwise co‐occurrence frequency and dependence are estimated, and joint distribution is calculated with the survival copula distribution function. The results indicate that AM values of the variables tend to co‐occur within a short time window, signifying that the flood risk changes with the extreme values of drivers. The maximum values of the AM series of drivers are observed in the same year as the largest flood in the series. The joint return periods of flood events show significant variations from their univariate estimates in both catchments, which have different flood‐generating mechanisms. This work re‐emphasises the findings in recent literature that the traditional univariate risk assessment methods based only on flood peak information may substantially underestimate/overestimate the risk of floods by neglecting the effects of their potential drivers and that a multivariate viewpoint is imperative for assessing the risk of floods.

International Journal of ClimatologyVol. 45(6)
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Ministry of Earth Sciences, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.