Právo na verejné prejednanie veci v trestnom konaní v judikatúre Európskeho súdu pre lúdské práva

Presented article is devoted to the right to public trial as one of the components of the right to fair trial under the Article 6 of European Convection of Human Rights. The author analyses the approach of the European Court and European Commission of Human Rights considering their case-law, and drafts the fundamental attitudes related to the opportunity to exclude the publicity of the trial either on the ground of the exceptions mentioned in the Article 6/1 the second sentence of the Convention or on the basis of the doctrine of implicit limitation, to the possibility of the party to a case to waive its right to public trial and to the requirement of the publicity of the decision. It is focused to the relation between the publicity of the trial to other rights guaranteed by the Convention such as presumption of innocence, right to private life under the Article 8, and the right to freedom of expression under the Article 10.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.161
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Právo na verejné prejednanie veci v trestnom konaní v judikatúre Európskeho súdu pre lúdské práva

Jana Štiavnická
AUC IURIDICA
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Právo na verejné prejednanie veci v trestnom konaní v judikatúre Európskeho súdu pre lúdské práva

Jana Štiavnická
article en

Abstract

Presented article is devoted to the right to public trial as one of the components of the right to fair trial under the Article 6 of European Convection of Human Rights. The author analyses the approach of the European Court and European Commission of Human Rights considering their case-law, and drafts the fundamental attitudes related to the opportunity to exclude the publicity of the trial either on the ground of the exceptions mentioned in the Article 6/1 the second sentence of the Convention or on the basis of the doctrine of implicit limitation, to the possibility of the party to a case to waive its right to public trial and to the requirement of the publicity of the decision. It is focused to the relation between the publicity of the trial to other rights guaranteed by the Convention such as presumption of innocence, right to private life under the Article 8, and the right to freedom of expression under the Article 10.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 48(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Právo na verejné prejednanie veci v trestnom konaní v judikatúre Európskeho súdu pre lúdské práva — Jana Štiavnická · AUC IURIDICA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS