Contextual effects on prospective person memory

To assist with missing person investigations, the public may be on the lookout during their everyday activities and alert the authorities if the person is encountered. In this Registered Report, participants encoded posters that included an image of a target person along with relevant, irrelevant, or no contextual information about that person. After viewing a poster, participants watched a video that included either the target or a plausible nontarget, using a new experimental paradigm that kept all other conditions of the encounter constant. Previous findings suggest contextual information could affect prospective person memory in several ways. If contextual cues are relevant, they could direct attention to targets and plausible nontargets without improving face recognition and hence have no effect on discriminability (<i>sighting bias hypothesis</i>). Alternatively, any contextual information at encoding (relevant or irrelevant) could encourage deeper processing of each target's identity and improve sighting discriminability (<i>elaborative encoding hypothesis</i>). A third possibility is that associating a target with relevant contextual information improves both face recognition and attention, resulting in greater sighting discrimination compared with irrelevant or no contextual information (<i>context matching hypothesis</i>). We tested 396 participants and found that associating target faces with contextual information had no significant effect on discriminating between targets and plausible nontargets. The context manipulation also had no significant effect on response bias. Our findings suggest that the previously reported recognition advantage might depend on the kind of contextual information at encoding, on how targets are encountered during testing, as well as on the type of recognition task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251323820
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual effects on prospective person memory

James Ost, Stefana Juncu, Ryan J. Fitzgerald, Hartmut Blank
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Contextual effects on prospective person memory

James Ost, Stefana Juncu, Ryan J. Fitzgerald, Hartmut Blank
article en

Abstract

To assist with missing person investigations, the public may be on the lookout during their everyday activities and alert the authorities if the person is encountered. In this Registered Report, participants encoded posters that included an image of a target person along with relevant, irrelevant, or no contextual information about that person. After viewing a poster, participants watched a video that included either the target or a plausible nontarget, using a new experimental paradigm that kept all other conditions of the encounter constant. Previous findings suggest contextual information could affect prospective person memory in several ways. If contextual cues are relevant, they could direct attention to targets and plausible nontargets without improving face recognition and hence have no effect on discriminability (<i>sighting bias hypothesis</i>). Alternatively, any contextual information at encoding (relevant or irrelevant) could encourage deeper processing of each target's identity and improve sighting discriminability (<i>elaborative encoding hypothesis</i>). A third possibility is that associating a target with relevant contextual information improves both face recognition and attention, resulting in greater sighting discrimination compared with irrelevant or no contextual information (<i>context matching hypothesis</i>). We tested 396 participants and found that associating target faces with contextual information had no significant effect on discriminating between targets and plausible nontargets. The context manipulation also had no significant effect on response bias. Our findings suggest that the previously reported recognition advantage might depend on the kind of contextual information at encoding, on how targets are encountered during testing, as well as on the type of recognition task.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 78(10)
Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Portsmouth (GB)
University of Oxford, Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.