The Nordic model of HRM from 1995–2021– a case of ‘bounded change’?

The aim of this comparative study is to investigate the degree of continuity in the distinctiveness of private-sector Nordic HRM in terms of calculative and collaborative HRM in relation to the prototypical liberal market economy – the UK – and the prototypical coordinated market economy – Germany. Our analysis employs firm-level data from the Cranet survey for the period 1995–2021. In line with institutional theory and its concept of ‘bounded change’ our findings indicate that, notwithstanding structural change and institutional developments, the Nordic countries continue to be characterized by a relatively low adoption of calculative HRM and a relatively high adoption of collaborative HRM. As such, they continue to constitute a cluster of countries that is distinctive in relation to both the UK and Germany.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2025.2462050
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nordic model of HRM from 1995–2021– a case of ‘bounded change’?

Paul N. Gooderham, Frans Bévort, Adam Smale, Arney Einarsdóttir et al.
1 citations
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

The Nordic model of HRM from 1995–2021– a case of ‘bounded change’?

Paul N. Gooderham, Frans Bévort, Adam Smale, Arney Einarsdóttir, Karen M. Olsen, Stefan Tengblad, Alexander Madsen Sandvik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this comparative study is to investigate the degree of continuity in the distinctiveness of private-sector Nordic HRM in terms of calculative and collaborative HRM in relation to the prototypical liberal market economy – the UK – and the prototypical coordinated market economy – Germany. Our analysis employs firm-level data from the Cranet survey for the period 1995–2021. In line with institutional theory and its concept of ‘bounded change’ our findings indicate that, notwithstanding structural change and institutional developments, the Nordic countries continue to be characterized by a relatively low adoption of calculative HRM and a relatively high adoption of collaborative HRM. As such, they continue to constitute a cluster of countries that is distinctive in relation to both the UK and Germany.

The International Journal of Human Resource ManagementVol. 36(12)
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Middlesex University Malta (MT), Bifröst University (IS), Middlesex University London (GB), University of Vaasa (FI), University of Gothenburg (SE), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Nordic model of HRM from 1995–2021– a case of ‘bounded change’? — Paul N. Gooderham, Frans Bévort, et al. · The International Journal of Human Resource Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS