Bank resolution and insolvency law: interactions and frictions

The aim of this article is to make a first pass at highlighting and summarising the main interactions between bank resolution and insolvency law, which sometimes result in frictions. The roots of these frictions lie in the different objectives of the two legal frameworks and the different interests that they aim to protect. Paradoxically, despite these frictions, resolution authorities in the European Union must apply the national insolvency law, which is still not harmonised at European level. And they must do so not only in the event of resolution, but also counterfactually, in ex post and ex ante situations, with respect to key issues (grounds for resolution, creditor protection and creditor hierarchy) that are either incompletely or too broadly regulated under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. In the absence of specific rules, this article aims to shed light on the main interpretative tensions between the rules that are applicable in resolution and their insolvency counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Stability Review
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53479/38941
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank resolution and insolvency law: interactions and frictions

J. A. Pulgar
2 citations
Financial Stability Review
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
1.89
article

Bank resolution and insolvency law: interactions and frictions

J. A. Pulgar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The aim of this article is to make a first pass at highlighting and summarising the main interactions between bank resolution and insolvency law, which sometimes result in frictions. The roots of these frictions lie in the different objectives of the two legal frameworks and the different interests that they aim to protect. Paradoxically, despite these frictions, resolution authorities in the European Union must apply the national insolvency law, which is still not harmonised at European level. And they must do so not only in the event of resolution, but also counterfactually, in ex post and ex ante situations, with respect to key issues (grounds for resolution, creditor protection and creditor hierarchy) that are either incompletely or too broadly regulated under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. In the absence of specific rules, this article aims to shed light on the main interpretative tensions between the rules that are applicable in resolution and their insolvency counterparts.

Financial Stability Review(Issue 47 (Autumn 2024))
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Banco de España
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
1.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.