Numerical analysis of energy loss in a laboratory-scale tandem double cylinders based on entropy production method

Vortex-induced vibration (VIV) to capture low-velocity water current energy has broad application prospects. To utilize low-velocity hydrokinetic energy on a large scale, the energy capture structure should be composed of multiple cylinders. In this paper, the hydrokinetic energy harvested from low-velocity water current with two three-dimensional cylinder oscillators in tandem arrangement driven by VIV is simulated in the range of reduced velocity Ur = 2–13. The entropy production theory is applied to evaluate energy loss quantitatively and analyze the correlation between energy dissipation and hydrokinetic energy capture of upstream and downstream cylinders. Combined with Liutex’s third-generation vortex identification method, the correlation between vortex coupling and evolution process and energy loss of the two cylinders is obtained. The results show the following: (1) The amplitude response of both upstream and downstream cylinders shows three distinct response branches. (2) The maximum energy capture efficiencies of the upstream and downstream cylinders are 40.53% and 37.71%, respectively. Peak power and efficiency are observed primarily in the upper branch, diminishing after transitioning to the lower branch and eventually approaching zero. (3) The main loss of turbulent entropy production (EPTD) caused by turbulence dissipation, collision, and vortex accounts for the largest proportion, up to more than 99%, while the entropy production rate caused by direct dissipation is close to 0 and can be negligible. In the lower branch, the entropy production loss increases exponentially, resulting in a significant decrease in the captured hydrokinetic energy PVIV and efficiency ηVIV of the two cylinders. The local entropy production rate caused by wall shear stress is larger in the process of vortex formation and smaller in the process of vortex shedding. The variations in the entropy production rate caused by wall shear stress reflect the strength of the interaction between the fluid and the structure, consequently reflecting the ability of hydrokinetic energy harvested by the upstream and downstream oscillators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241187
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical analysis of energy loss in a laboratory-scale tandem double cylinders based on entropy production method

Tao Guo, Zhumei Luo, Juan Duan, Ye Li et al.
1 citations
AIP Advances
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
1.33
article

Numerical analysis of energy loss in a laboratory-scale tandem double cylinders based on entropy production method

Tao Guo, Zhumei Luo, Juan Duan, Ye Li, Jun Li, Han Liang, Xia Ren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Vortex-induced vibration (VIV) to capture low-velocity water current energy has broad application prospects. To utilize low-velocity hydrokinetic energy on a large scale, the energy capture structure should be composed of multiple cylinders. In this paper, the hydrokinetic energy harvested from low-velocity water current with two three-dimensional cylinder oscillators in tandem arrangement driven by VIV is simulated in the range of reduced velocity Ur = 2–13. The entropy production theory is applied to evaluate energy loss quantitatively and analyze the correlation between energy dissipation and hydrokinetic energy capture of upstream and downstream cylinders. Combined with Liutex’s third-generation vortex identification method, the correlation between vortex coupling and evolution process and energy loss of the two cylinders is obtained. The results show the following: (1) The amplitude response of both upstream and downstream cylinders shows three distinct response branches. (2) The maximum energy capture efficiencies of the upstream and downstream cylinders are 40.53% and 37.71%, respectively. Peak power and efficiency are observed primarily in the upper branch, diminishing after transitioning to the lower branch and eventually approaching zero. (3) The main loss of turbulent entropy production (EPTD) caused by turbulence dissipation, collision, and vortex accounts for the largest proportion, up to more than 99%, while the entropy production rate caused by direct dissipation is close to 0 and can be negligible. In the lower branch, the entropy production loss increases exponentially, resulting in a significant decrease in the captured hydrokinetic energy PVIV and efficiency ηVIV of the two cylinders. The local entropy production rate caused by wall shear stress is larger in the process of vortex formation and smaller in the process of vortex shedding. The variations in the entropy production rate caused by wall shear stress reflect the strength of the interaction between the fluid and the structure, consequently reflecting the ability of hydrokinetic energy harvested by the upstream and downstream oscillators.

AIP AdvancesVol. 15(2)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Guizhou Electric Power Design and Research Institute (CN)
Applied Basic Research Key Project of Yunnan, National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.