Comparative Analysis of State of Charge Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Batteries in a 4S3P Configuration

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three State of Charge (SoC) estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries: Coulomb Counting, Voltage-based, and Deep Learning. The study evaluates their performance in a simulated environment with varying temperature profiles, discharge conditions, and capacity adjustments. Metrics such as RMSE and MAE were used to assess accuracy. Results show that Voltage-based estimation achieves the highest accuracy in the simulated scenario (RMSE: 0.4159, MAE: 0.3744), while Deep Learning demonstrates superior adaptability to non-linear conditions. Coulomb Counting, though simple, suffers from significant error accumulation (RMSE: 187.7519, MAE: 163.0211). These findings highlight the strengths and limitations of each method, offering insights for their application in battery management systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia. Technology, science and society.
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59324/stss.2025.2(2).02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of State of Charge Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Batteries in a 4S3P Configuration

Tian‐Jian Hsu, Hla Myo Tun, Devasis Pradhan, Lei Lei Yin Win et al.
1 citations
Scientia. Technology, science and society.
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Comparative Analysis of State of Charge Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Batteries in a 4S3P Configuration

Tian‐Jian Hsu, Hla Myo Tun, Devasis Pradhan, Lei Lei Yin Win, Khaing Thandar Soe, Thanda Win
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three State of Charge (SoC) estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries: Coulomb Counting, Voltage-based, and Deep Learning. The study evaluates their performance in a simulated environment with varying temperature profiles, discharge conditions, and capacity adjustments. Metrics such as RMSE and MAE were used to assess accuracy. Results show that Voltage-based estimation achieves the highest accuracy in the simulated scenario (RMSE: 0.4159, MAE: 0.3744), while Deep Learning demonstrates superior adaptability to non-linear conditions. Coulomb Counting, though simple, suffers from significant error accumulation (RMSE: 187.7519, MAE: 163.0211). These findings highlight the strengths and limitations of each method, offering insights for their application in battery management systems.

Scientia. Technology, science and society.Vol. 2(2)
Yangon Technological University (MM), Institute of Wood Science and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of State of Charge Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Batteries in a 4S3P Configuration — Tian‐Jian Hsu, Hla Myo Tun, et al. · Scientia. Technology, science and society. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS