PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a Second Observer Design
<b>Background:</b> PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and characterization system that has demonstrated a high diagnostic yield for in vitro detection of colorectal polyps. Our objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of expert endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection. <b>Methods:</b> PolyDeep Advance 1 (NCT05514301) is an unicentric diagnostic test study with a second observer design. Endoscopists performed colonoscopy blinded to PolyDeep's detection results. The main endpoint was the sensitivity for colorectal polyp (adenoma, serrated or hyperplastic lesion) detection. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic performance for diminutive lesions (≤5 mm), neoplasia (adenoma, serrated lesion) and adenoma detection. <b>Results:</b> We included 205 patients (55.1% male, 63.0 ± 6.2 years of age) referred to colonoscopy (positive faecal immunochemical occult blood test = 60.5%, surveillance colonoscopy = 39.5%). We excluded eight patients due to incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopists detected 384 lesions, of which 39 were not detected by PolyDeep. In contrast, PolyDeep predicted 410 possible additional lesions, 26 of these predictions confirmed by endoscopists as lesions, resulting in a potential 6.8% detection increase with respect to the 384 lesions detected by the endoscopists. In total, 410 lesions were detected, 20 were not retrieved, five were colorectal adenocarcinoma, 343 were colorectal polyps (231 adenomas, 39 serrated and 73 hyperplastic polyps), 42 were normal mucosa and 289 were ≤5 mm. We did not find statistically significant differences between endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection (Sensitivity = 94.2%, 91.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.2; Specificity = 9.5%, 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), diminutive lesions (Sensitivity = 92.3%, 89.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.4; Specificity = 9.8%, 14.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), neoplasia (Sensitivity = 95.2%, 92.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.3; Specificity = 9.6%, 13.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.4) and adenoma detection (Sensitivity = 94.4%, 92.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.5; Specificity = 7.2%, 11.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.2). <b>Conclusions:</b> Expert endoscopists and PolyDeep have similar diagnostic performance for colorectal polyp detection.
Authors
- Eloy Sánchez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-8303)
- Laura Rivas
- Joaquín Cubiella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-4831)
- Miguel Reboiro‐Jato (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-2703)
- Alba Nogueira-Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5991-7698)
- R. Domínguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-2389)
- Hugo López-Fernández (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-7206)
- Daniel Glez‐Peña (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-7245)
- Florentino Fdez‐Riverola (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-8013)
- Manuel Puga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-3889)
- Pablo Vega (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-6297)
- Sara Zarraquiños (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-618X)
- David Remedios (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-0317)
- Noel Pin Vieito (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-4104)
- Pedro Dávila-Piñón (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-4051)
- Astrid Irene Díez‐Martín (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8822-2991)
- Jesús Herrero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-2962)
- Santiago Soto
- Teresa Pedrido
Institutions
- Galicia Sur Biomedical Foundation (ES)
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica (ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES)
- Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES)
- i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense (ES)
- Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostics
- Published
- 2025-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040458
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.09
Funders
- European Commission
- Xunta de Galicia
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- European Regional Development Fund
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación