PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a Second Observer Design

<b>Background:</b> PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and characterization system that has demonstrated a high diagnostic yield for in vitro detection of colorectal polyps. Our objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of expert endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection. <b>Methods:</b> PolyDeep Advance 1 (NCT05514301) is an unicentric diagnostic test study with a second observer design. Endoscopists performed colonoscopy blinded to PolyDeep's detection results. The main endpoint was the sensitivity for colorectal polyp (adenoma, serrated or hyperplastic lesion) detection. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic performance for diminutive lesions (≤5 mm), neoplasia (adenoma, serrated lesion) and adenoma detection. <b>Results:</b> We included 205 patients (55.1% male, 63.0 ± 6.2 years of age) referred to colonoscopy (positive faecal immunochemical occult blood test = 60.5%, surveillance colonoscopy = 39.5%). We excluded eight patients due to incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopists detected 384 lesions, of which 39 were not detected by PolyDeep. In contrast, PolyDeep predicted 410 possible additional lesions, 26 of these predictions confirmed by endoscopists as lesions, resulting in a potential 6.8% detection increase with respect to the 384 lesions detected by the endoscopists. In total, 410 lesions were detected, 20 were not retrieved, five were colorectal adenocarcinoma, 343 were colorectal polyps (231 adenomas, 39 serrated and 73 hyperplastic polyps), 42 were normal mucosa and 289 were ≤5 mm. We did not find statistically significant differences between endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection (Sensitivity = 94.2%, 91.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.2; Specificity = 9.5%, 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), diminutive lesions (Sensitivity = 92.3%, 89.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.4; Specificity = 9.8%, 14.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), neoplasia (Sensitivity = 95.2%, 92.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.3; Specificity = 9.6%, 13.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.4) and adenoma detection (Sensitivity = 94.4%, 92.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.5; Specificity = 7.2%, 11.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.2). <b>Conclusions:</b> Expert endoscopists and PolyDeep have similar diagnostic performance for colorectal polyp detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040458
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a Second Observer Design

Eloy Sánchez, Laura Rivas, Joaquín Cubiella, Miguel Reboiro‐Jato et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
2.09
article

PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a Second Observer Design

Eloy Sánchez, Laura Rivas, Joaquín Cubiella, Miguel Reboiro‐Jato, Alba Nogueira-Rodríguez, R. Domínguez, Hugo López-Fernández, Daniel Glez‐Peña, Florentino Fdez‐Riverola, Manuel Puga, Pablo Vega, Sara Zarraquiños, David Remedios, Noel Pin Vieito, Pedro Dávila-Piñón, Astrid Irene Díez‐Martín, Jesús Herrero, Santiago Soto, Teresa Pedrido
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and characterization system that has demonstrated a high diagnostic yield for in vitro detection of colorectal polyps. Our objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of expert endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection. <b>Methods:</b> PolyDeep Advance 1 (NCT05514301) is an unicentric diagnostic test study with a second observer design. Endoscopists performed colonoscopy blinded to PolyDeep's detection results. The main endpoint was the sensitivity for colorectal polyp (adenoma, serrated or hyperplastic lesion) detection. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic performance for diminutive lesions (≤5 mm), neoplasia (adenoma, serrated lesion) and adenoma detection. <b>Results:</b> We included 205 patients (55.1% male, 63.0 ± 6.2 years of age) referred to colonoscopy (positive faecal immunochemical occult blood test = 60.5%, surveillance colonoscopy = 39.5%). We excluded eight patients due to incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopists detected 384 lesions, of which 39 were not detected by PolyDeep. In contrast, PolyDeep predicted 410 possible additional lesions, 26 of these predictions confirmed by endoscopists as lesions, resulting in a potential 6.8% detection increase with respect to the 384 lesions detected by the endoscopists. In total, 410 lesions were detected, 20 were not retrieved, five were colorectal adenocarcinoma, 343 were colorectal polyps (231 adenomas, 39 serrated and 73 hyperplastic polyps), 42 were normal mucosa and 289 were ≤5 mm. We did not find statistically significant differences between endoscopists and PolyDeep for colorectal polyp detection (Sensitivity = 94.2%, 91.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.2; Specificity = 9.5%, 14.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), diminutive lesions (Sensitivity = 92.3%, 89.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.4; Specificity = 9.8%, 14.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), neoplasia (Sensitivity = 95.2%, 92.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.3; Specificity = 9.6%, 13.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.4) and adenoma detection (Sensitivity = 94.4%, 92.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.5; Specificity = 7.2%, 11.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.2). <b>Conclusions:</b> Expert endoscopists and PolyDeep have similar diagnostic performance for colorectal polyp detection.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(4)
Galicia Sur Biomedical Foundation (ES), Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES), Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense (ES), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
European Commission, Xunta de Galicia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.