Did Welfare Reform End the Safety Net as We Knew It? The Record since 1996

This paper examines the evolution of the safety net for low-income families since welfare reform in 1996 promised to “end welfare as we know it.” The total package of supports has become substantially more generous, but has changed in character. Support has shifted away from monthly cash transfers towards tax credits and in-kind benefits, and has expanded for working families while declining for those without earnings. Resources available to married-parent families have expanded, whereas those for adults without dependents remain scant. We also document that, despite expanded state flexibilities, variability in generosity across states did not grow due to simultaneous expansions of federal food assistance and tax credits. Overall, these changes reflect ongoing contention over two key policy issues. First, what is the appropriate trade-off between promoting work versus preventing material hardship? Second, what is the appropriate role for states versus the federal government in determining safety net generosity?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20231392
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Did Welfare Reform End the Safety Net as We Knew It? The Record since 1996

Tara Watson, Lara Shore‐Sheppard, Lucie Schmidt
2 citations
The Journal of Economic Perspectives
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
7.73
article

Did Welfare Reform End the Safety Net as We Knew It? The Record since 1996

Tara Watson, Lara Shore‐Sheppard, Lucie Schmidt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of the safety net for low-income families since welfare reform in 1996 promised to “end welfare as we know it.” The total package of supports has become substantially more generous, but has changed in character. Support has shifted away from monthly cash transfers towards tax credits and in-kind benefits, and has expanded for working families while declining for those without earnings. Resources available to married-parent families have expanded, whereas those for adults without dependents remain scant. We also document that, despite expanded state flexibilities, variability in generosity across states did not grow due to simultaneous expansions of federal food assistance and tax credits. Overall, these changes reflect ongoing contention over two key policy issues. First, what is the appropriate trade-off between promoting work versus preventing material hardship? Second, what is the appropriate role for states versus the federal government in determining safety net generosity?

The Journal of Economic PerspectivesVol. 39(1)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Williams College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.