Fraction of Genome Altered, Age, Microsatellite Instability Score, Tumor Mutational Burden, Cancer Type, Metastasis Status, and Choice of Cancer Therapy Predict Overall Survival in Multiple Machine Learning Models

Background/Objectives: The accurate prediction of overall survival (OS) in cancer patients is crucial for personalized treatment strategies. Methods: In this study, we developed machine learning models to predict OS by integrating clinical and mutational features from a cohort of 25,508 cancer patients. Key features included tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), fraction of genome altered (FGA), copy number alterations (CNA), age, sex, race, cancer type, and metastasis status. Results: We applied multiple Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Ensemble models, achieving an accuracy of 74% for overall survival status, and a C-Index of 0.76 using the Random Survival Forest model. Importantly, FGA, age, MSI score, TMB, cancer type, and metastasis status were identified as major predictors of OS across all models. We also integrated treatment data from 16,603 patients, demonstrating that therapies like platinum, carboplatin, and taxanes are associated with differences in survival predictions, with some therapeutic regimens showing minimal impact. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of using machine learning to predict OS by incorporating both clinical and mutational features. These models offer a promising approach for improving patient outcomes and could be further validated in prospective studies for clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Onco
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/onco5010008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fraction of Genome Altered, Age, Microsatellite Instability Score, Tumor Mutational Burden, Cancer Type, Metastasis Status, and Choice of Cancer Therapy Predict Overall Survival in Multiple Machine Learning Models

Guillaume Mestrallet
2 citations
Onco
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.87
article

Fraction of Genome Altered, Age, Microsatellite Instability Score, Tumor Mutational Burden, Cancer Type, Metastasis Status, and Choice of Cancer Therapy Predict Overall Survival in Multiple Machine Learning Models

Guillaume Mestrallet
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The accurate prediction of overall survival (OS) in cancer patients is crucial for personalized treatment strategies. Methods: In this study, we developed machine learning models to predict OS by integrating clinical and mutational features from a cohort of 25,508 cancer patients. Key features included tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), fraction of genome altered (FGA), copy number alterations (CNA), age, sex, race, cancer type, and metastasis status. Results: We applied multiple Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Ensemble models, achieving an accuracy of 74% for overall survival status, and a C-Index of 0.76 using the Random Survival Forest model. Importantly, FGA, age, MSI score, TMB, cancer type, and metastasis status were identified as major predictors of OS across all models. We also integrated treatment data from 16,603 patients, demonstrating that therapies like platinum, carboplatin, and taxanes are associated with differences in survival predictions, with some therapeutic regimens showing minimal impact. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of using machine learning to predict OS by incorporating both clinical and mutational features. These models offer a promising approach for improving patient outcomes and could be further validated in prospective studies for clinical use.

OncoVol. 5(1)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.