Vinipel Curing: A Sustainable Approach to Enhanced Concrete Durability and Strength

Currently, the demand for environmental sustainability options in the construction industry is increasing, especially those related to the correct use of water. The aim of this work is to study different sustainable alternatives that minimize the use of water in cured hydraulic concrete, analyzing the effect of curing on hydration, microstructure, and compressive strength of hydraulic concrete exposed to different curing techniques: Manual Curing, Standard Curing, Vinipel, and Uncured. An experimental study was conducted using 180 cylindrical hydraulic concrete specimens, which were compression-tested at 7, 28, and 56 days. A Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer analysis was carried out to examine the microstructural and compositional changes under the different curing techniques. The results indicate that the Vinipel technique is the best alternative, showing a compressive strength of 35 MPa after 56 days of curing. In general, Vinipel > Standard Curing > Manual Curing > Uncured is the order of strength from highest to lowest. The formation of hydration products was observed in all curing techniques. The presence of ettringite, complementing by abundant portlandite in Vinipel, shows the dominance of an important product in the strength of concrete. The best strength capacity under load and the lowest percentages of vacuum are likely to be favorable for the durability of the processes.